Abstract:BACKGROUND:In 2007, the Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation-Translation of Research Into Practice Study (SAFE-TRIPS) reported that 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) were the most commonly used resuscitation fluids in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Evidence has emerged since 2007 that these fluids are associated with adverse patient-centred outcomes. Based on the published evidence since 2007, we sought to determine the current type of fluid resuscitation used in clinical practice and the predictors of fluid choice and determine whether these have changed between 2007 and 2014. METHODS:In 2014, an international, cross-sectional study was conducted (Fluid-TRIPS) to document current patterns of intravenous resuscitation fluid use and determine factors associated with fluid choice. We examined univariate and multivariate associations between patients and prescriber characteristics, geographical region and fluid type. Additionally, we report secular trends of resuscitation fluid use in a cohort of ICUs that participated in both the 2007 and 2014 studies. Regression analysis were conducted to determine changes in the administration of crystalloid or colloid between 2007 and 2014. FINDINGS:In 2014, a total of 426 ICUs in 27 countries participated. Over the 24 hour study day, 1456/6707 (21.7%) patients received resuscitation fluid during 2716 resuscitation episodes. Crystalloids were administered to 1227/1456 (84.3%) patients during 2208/2716 (81.3%) episodes and colloids to 394/1456 (27.1%) patients during 581/2716 (21.4%) episodes. In multivariate analyses, practice significantly varied between geographical regions. Additionally, patients with a traumatic brain injury were less likely to receive colloid when compared to patients with no trauma (adjusted OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.62; p = 0.003). Patients in the ICU for one or more days where more likely to receive colloid compared to patients in the ICU on their admission date (adjusted OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.41; p = <0.001). For secular trends in fluid resuscitation, 84 ICUs in 17 countries contributed data. In 2007, 527/1663 (31.7%) patients received fluid resuscitation during 1167 episodes compared to 491/1763 (27.9%) patients during 960 episodes in 2014. The use of crystalloids increased from 498/1167 (42.7%) in 2007 to 694/960 (72.3%) in 2014 (odds ratio (OR) 3.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.95 to 4.77; p = <0.001), primarily due to a significant increase in the use of buffered salt solutions. The use of colloids decreased from 724/1167 (62.0%) in 2007 to 297/960 (30.9%) in 2014 (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.43; p = <0.001), primarily due to a decrease in the use of HES, but an overall increase in the use of albumin. CONCLUSIONS:Clinical practices of intravenous fluid resuscitation have changed between 2007 and 2014. Geographical location remains a strong predictor of the type of fluid administered for fluid resuscitation. Overall, there is a preferential use of crystalloids, specifically buffered salt solutions, over colloids. There is now an imperative to conduct a trial determining the safety and efficacy of these fluids on patient-centred outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinicaltrials.gov: Fluid-Translation of research into practice study (Fluid-TRIPS) NCT02002013.

Resuscitation fluid use in Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Units between 2007 and 2013

Patterns of Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation Use in Adult Intensive Care Patients Between 2007 and 2014: an International Cross-Sectional Study

A review of adult resuscitative fluid purchasing and usage trends at an academic tertiary hospital in Johannesburg

Albumin Versus Other Fluids For Fluid Resuscitation In Patients With Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis

An international comparison of the cost of fluid resuscitation therapies

Fluid resuscitation practice patterns in intensive care units of the USA: a cross-sectional survey of critical care physicians

Early sepsis in Australia and New Zealand: A point‐prevalence study of haemodynamic resuscitation practices

Balanced crystalloids compared to normal saline for fluid therapy in critically ill adult patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

[Colloids Vs. Crystalloids in Fluid Resuscitation for Septic Shock: a Meta-Analysis].

Hemodynamic Resuscitation Characteristics of Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis and Hypotension who are and are not Admitted to ICU; a Prospective Cross-sectional Study

Early high-volume resuscitation with crystalloid solution combined with albumin improves survival of critically ill patients: A retrospective analysis from MIMIC-IV database

Balanced crystalloid solutions versus normal saline in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Personalised fluid resuscitation in the ICU: still a fluid concept?

Balanced crystalloids versus saline for critically ill patients (BEST-Living): a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses

Fluid Management in Critically Ill Children: Single-Center Retrospective Comparison of Trauma and Postoperative Patients, 2020-2022

Fluid resuscitation in children with severe infection and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Balanced Crystalloids Versus Normal Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

Fluid boluses and infusions in the early phase of resuscitation from septic shock and sepsis-induced hypotension: a retrospective report and outcome analysis from a tertiary hospital

Assessment of outcomes in patients with heart failure and end-stage kidney disease following fluid resuscitation for sepsis and septic shock

Crystalloid Fluid Management of Non-Traumatic Hypotension by New South Wales Ambulance