Abstract:Abstract Introduction The choice of intravenous fluid for fluid therapy in critically ill adult patients remains a matter of debate. Currently, crystalloids are used more often than colloids, with ongoing controversy over the relative efficacy and safety of buffered salt solutions (BSS) versus normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride). In 2021 two large pragmatic trials enrolling critically ill patients will add substantial new data to address this controversy. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that will include the data from these two trials to provide clinicians with the most up to date evidence and robust evidence to guide their choice of crystalloid fluids. Methods and analysis We will include RCTs that compare the effect of buffered salt solutions to normal saline for fluid resuscitation and/or fluid therapy in critically ill adults, on all-cause mortality and other patient centred outcomes. We will perform a search that includes the electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE, and clinical trial registries. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. We will report study characteristics and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool. We will perform Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects aggregate data meta-analysis whenever it is feasible to do so. We will evaluate overall certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Ethics and dissemination This systematic review and meta-analysis does not require ethical approval as it does not involve primary data collection. We will publish our results in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and present them at national and international scientific conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021243399 Strengths and limitations of this review [box] This systematic review will provide up-to-date evidence to answer the focused clinical question: In adult patients who are critically ill, does administering balanced crystalloid solutions for fluid therapy reduce mortality and other patient-centered outcomes, compared with administering 0.9% sodium chloride? We will conduct a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines, searching three electronic databases, clinical trial registries and published conference abstracts, with two independent reviewers evaluating studies and extracting data. A meta-analysis will assess the primary outcome of all-cause mortality at 90 days and secondary outcomes of ventilator and vasopressor free days, renal replacement therapy use, incidence of acute kidney injury, and patient quality of life outcomes. The limitations of this review include the clinical heterogeneity of the included trials, diversity of the targeted population receiving fluid therapy, variability in the composition of balanced crystalloid solutions, and timing of initiation of study crystalloids. We will address all limitations with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.

HIGH ENERGY SPECTROSCOPY OF MAGNETIC MATERIALS

Balanced Crystalloids Versus Normal Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

Balanced crystalloids versus isotonic saline in pediatric sepsis: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Balanced crystalloids versus saline for critically ill patients (BEST-Living): a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

No Bene Fi T of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Balanced crystalloids compared to normal saline for fluid therapy in critically ill adult patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Balanced Crystalloids versus Normal Saline in Adults with Sepsis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Albumin Versus Other Fluids For Fluid Resuscitation In Patients With Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis

Association between the use of balanced fluids and outcomes in critically ill children: a before and after study

Balanced Crystalloids Versus Normal Saline in Kidney Transplant Patients: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis

Intensive- Vs Less-Intensive-dose Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for the Intensive Care Unit–related Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses

Fluid resuscitation in children with severe infection and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Early high-volume resuscitation with crystalloid solution combined with albumin improves survival of critically ill patients: A retrospective analysis from MIMIC-IV database

Comparison of balanced crystalloids versus normal saline in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Perioperative fluid management for adult cardiac surgery: network meta-analysis pooling on twenty randomised controlled trials

Electrolyte derangements in critically ill children receiving balanced versus unbalanced crystalloid fluid resuscitation

ACETATE RINGER'S SOLUTION VERSUS NORMAL SALINE SOLUTION IN SEPSIS: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL

Comparative efficacy of balanced crystalloids versus 0.9% saline on delayed graft function and perioperative outcomes in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Efficacy of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Intermittent Hemodialysis in Patients with Renal Failure in Intensive Care Unit: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

A balancing act: drifting away from the reflexive use of “ab”normal saline