Abstract:Over the past few years, many machine learning-based scoring functions for predicting the binding of small molecules to proteins have been developed. Their objective is to approximate the distribution which takes two molecules as input and outputs the energy of their interaction. Only a scoring function that accounts for the interatomic interactions involved in binding can accurately predict binding affinity on unseen molecules. However, many scoring functions make predictions based on data set biases rather than an understanding of the physics of binding. These scoring functions perform well when tested on similar targets to those in the training set but fail to generalize to dissimilar targets. To test what a machine learning-based scoring function has learned, input attribution, a technique for learning which features are important to a model when making a prediction on a particular data point, can be applied. If a model successfully learns something beyond data set biases, attribution should give insight into the important binding interactions that are taking place. We built a machine learning-based scoring function that aimed to avoid the influence of bias via thorough train and test data set filtering and show that it achieves comparable performance on the Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions, 2016 (CASF-2016) benchmark to other leading methods. We then use the CASF-2016 test set to perform attribution and find that the bonds identified as important by PointVS, unlike those extracted from other scoring functions, have a high correlation with those found by a distance-based interaction profiler. We then show that attribution can be used to extract important binding pharmacophores from a given protein target when supplied with a number of bound structures. We use this information to perform fragment elaboration and see improvements in docking scores compared to using structural information from a traditional, data-based approach. This not only provides definitive proof that the scoring function has learned to identify some important binding interactions but also constitutes the first deep learning-based method for extracting structural information from a target for molecule design.

Low-Quality Structural and Interaction Data Improves Binding Affinity Prediction via Random Forest

A machine learning approach to predicting protein–ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking

True Accuracy of Fast Scoring Functions to Predict High-Throughput Screening Data from Docking Poses: The Simpler the Better

Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein–Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity?

A Generalized Protein-Ligand Scoring Framework with Balanced Scoring, Docking, Ranking and Screening Powers.

Further Development and Validation of Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Binding Affinity Prediction

DeepBSP—a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein–Ligand Docking Structures

Synergistic Application of Molecular Docking and Machine Learning for Improved Binding Pose

Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Drug Discoveries from Experimental and Computer-Generated Protein-Ligand Structures: Towards Per-Target Scoring Functions

A high quality, industrial data set for binding affinity prediction: performance comparison in different early drug discovery scenarios

PDBBind Optimization to Create a High-Quality Protein-Ligand Binding Dataset for Binding Affinity Prediction

A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening

A Diverse Benchmark Based on 3D Matched Molecular Pairs for Validating Scoring Functions

Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein‐ligand Complexes

Leak Proof PDBBind: A Reorganized Dataset of Protein-Ligand Complexes for More Generalizable Binding Affinity Prediction

The role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions

Improving protein–ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term

ET‐score: Improving Protein‐ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance‐weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm

Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.

Machine‐learning scoring functions for structure‐based drug lead optimization

Can molecular dynamics simulations improve predictions of protein-ligand binding affinity with machine learning?