Abstract:Individuals often continue to rely on misinformation in their reasoning and decision making even after it has been corrected. This is known as the continued influence effect, and one of its presumed drivers is misinformation familiarity. As continued influence can promote misguided or unsafe behaviours, it is important to find ways to minimize the effect by designing more effective corrections. It has been argued that correction effectiveness is reduced if the correction repeats the to-be-debunked misinformation, thereby boosting its familiarity. Some have even suggested that this familiarity boost may cause a correction to inadvertently increase subsequent misinformation reliance; a phenomenon termed the familiarity backfire effect. A study by Pluviano et al. (2017) found evidence for this phenomenon using vaccine-related stimuli. The authors found that repeating vaccine "myths" and contrasting them with corresponding facts backfired relative to a control condition, ironically increasing false vaccine beliefs. The present study sought to replicate and extend this study. We included four conditions from the original Pluviano et al. study: the myths vs. facts, a visual infographic, a fear appeal, and a control condition. The present study also added a "myths-only" condition, which simply repeated false claims and labelled them as false; theoretically, this condition should be most likely to produce familiarity backfire. Participants received vaccine-myth corrections and were tested immediately post-correction, and again after a seven-day delay. We found that the myths vs. facts condition reduced vaccine misconceptions. None of the conditions increased vaccine misconceptions relative to control at either timepoint, or relative to a pre-intervention baseline; thus, no backfire effects were observed. This failure to replicate adds to the mounting evidence against familiarity backfire effects and has implications for vaccination communications and the design of debunking interventions.

Correcting statistical misinformation about scientific findings in the media: Causation versus correlation.

A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation

Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?

Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation

Scrolling through fake news: The effect of presentation order on misinformation retention.

One Dose Is Not Enough: The Beneficial Effect of Corrective COVID-19 Information Is Diminished If Followed by Misinformation

Correcting vaccine misinformation: A failure to replicate familiarity or fear-driven backfire effects

Correcting vaccine misinformation on social media: the inadvertent effects of repeating misinformation within such corrections on COVID-19 vaccine misperceptions

Causal theory error in college students' understanding of science studies

The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction

Correction Experiences on Social Media During COVID-19

Who corrects misinformation online? Self-perceived media literacy and the moderating role of reflective judgment

Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample

Studying the Downstream Effects of Fact-Checking on Social Media: Experiments on Correction Formats, Belief Accuracy, and Media Trust

Investigation of the Determinants for Misinformation Correction Effectiveness on Social Media During COVID-19 Pandemic

Self-Correction or Other-Correction: the Effects of Source Consistency and Ways of Correction on Sharing Intention of Health Misinformation Correction.

Comparing the Effects of Simple and Refutational Narratives in Misinformation Correction: the Moderating Roles of Correction Placement and Issue Involvement

Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study

Does Mud Really Stick? No Evidence for Continued Influence of Misinformation on Newly Formed Person Impressions

The effectiveness of refutation text in confronting scientific misconceptions: A meta-analysis

The role of relevance in the continued influence effect of misinformation under different retraction methods