Abstract:BACKGROUND: The Internet has recently made possible the free global availability of scientific journal articles. Open Access (OA) can occur either via OA scientific journals, or via authors posting manuscripts of articles published in subscription journals in open web repositories. So far there have been few systematic studies showing how big the extent of OA is, in particular studies covering all fields of science.METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The proportion of peer reviewed scholarly journal articles, which are available openly in full text on the web, was studied using a random sample of 1837 titles and a web search engine. Of articles published in 2008, 8.5% were freely available at the publishers' sites. For an additional 11.9% free manuscript versions could be found using search engines, making the overall OA percentage 20.4%. Chemistry (13%) had the lowest overall share of OA, Earth Sciences (33%) the highest. In medicine, biochemistry and chemistry publishing in OA journals was more common. In all other fields author-posted manuscript copies dominated the picture.CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results show that OA already has a significant positive impact on the availability of the scientific journal literature and that there are big differences between scientific disciplines in the uptake. Due to the lack of awareness of OA-publishing among scientists in most fields outside physics, the results should be of general interest to all scholars. The results should also interest academic publishers, who need to take into account OA in their business strategies and copyright policies, as well as research funders, who like the NIH are starting to require OA availability of results from research projects they fund. The method and search tools developed also offer a good basis for more in-depth studies as well as longitudinal studies.

Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields

Google Scholar as a tool for discovering journal articles in library and information science

The number of scholarly documents on the public web

ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations

Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

An Investigation of Open Access Availability of Library and Information Science Research

Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories

Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009

Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles

A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus

Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn’t?

Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment

A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

A new comparative citation analysis: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, and Web of Science

The dark side of Open Access in Google and Google Scholar: the case of Latin-American repositories

Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison

The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study

Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar

Mining Google Scholar Citations: An Exploratory Study.

Back to the past: on the shoulders of an academic search engine giant