Abstract:New sources of citation data have recently become available, such as Microsoft Academic, Dimensions, and the OpenCitations Index of CrossRef open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI). Although these have been compared to the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS), Scopus, or Google Scholar, there is no systematic evidence of their differences across subject categories. In response, this paper investigates 3,073,351 citations found by these six data sources to 2,515 English-language highly-cited documents published in 2006 from 252 subject categories, expanding and updating the largest previous study. Google Scholar found 88% of all citations, many of which were not found by the other sources, and nearly all citations found by the remaining sources (89–94%). A similar pattern held within most subject categories. Microsoft Academic is the second largest overall (60% of all citations), including 82% of Scopus citations and 86% of WoS citations. In most categories, Microsoft Academic found more citations than Scopus and WoS (182 and 223 subject categories, respectively), but had coverage gaps in some areas, such as Physics and some Humanities categories. After Scopus, Dimensions is fourth largest (54% of all citations), including 84% of Scopus citations and 88% of WoS citations. It found more citations than Scopus in 36 categories, more than WoS in 185, and displays some coverage gaps, especially in the Humanities. Following WoS, COCI is the smallest, with 28% of all citations. Google Scholar is still the most comprehensive source. In many subject categories Microsoft Academic and Dimensions are good alternatives to Scopus and WoS in terms of coverage.

Mining Google Scholar Citations: An Exploratory Study.

Survey of Visualization Methods on Academic Citation Information

Citation Recommendation Via Time-series Scholarly Topic Analysis and Publication Prior Analysis.

Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment

Building and Analyzing a Global Co-Authorship Network Using Google Scholar Data

Empirical Patterns in Google Scholar Citation Counts

A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

Google Scholar: the 'big data' bibliographic tool

Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?

Back to the past: on the shoulders of an academic search engine giant

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations

Google Scholar is manipulatable

Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities

A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics

A Comparative Study on Web of Science Citations and Google Scholar Citations

The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators

A bibliographic study on big data: concepts, trends and challenges

A new comparative citation analysis: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, and Web of Science

The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute

In Search of an Academic "Greatest Hits" Album: An Examination of Bibliometrics and Bibliometric Web Platforms

Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar