Abstract:Social media are used as main discussion channels by millions of individuals every day. The content individuals produce in daily social-media-based micro-communications, and the emotions therein expressed, may impact the emotional states of others. A recent experiment performed on Facebook hypothesized that emotions spread online, even in absence of non-verbal cues typical of in-person interactions, and that individuals are more likely to adopt positive or negative emotions if these are over-expressed in their social network. Experiments of this type, however, raise ethical concerns, as they require massive-scale content manipulation with unknown consequences for the individuals therein involved. Here, we study the dynamics of emotional contagion using a random sample of Twitter users, whose activity (and the stimuli they were exposed to) was observed during a week of September 2014. Rather than manipulating content, we devise a null model that discounts some confounding factors (including the effect of emotional contagion). We measure the emotional valence of content the users are exposed to before posting their own tweets. We determine that on average a negative post follows an over-exposure to 4.34% more negative content than baseline, while positive posts occur after an average over-exposure to 4.50% more positive contents. We highlight the presence of a linear relationship between the average emotional valence of the stimuli users are exposed to, and that of the responses they produce. We also identify two different classes of individuals: highly and scarcely susceptible to emotional contagion. Highly susceptible users are significantly less inclined to adopt negative emotions than the scarcely susceptible ones, but equally likely to adopt positive emotions. In general, the likelihood of adopting positive emotions is much greater than that of negative emotions.

Moody news: The impact of collective emotion ratings on online news consumers’ attitudes, memory, and behavioral intentions

Measuring 9 Emotions of News Posts from 8 News Organizations across 4 Social Media Platforms for 8 Months

Tweet Moodifier: Towards giving emotional awareness to Twitter users

Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media

How Social Media Shapes One’s Public Mood: the Three-Way Interaction Effect of Sphere, Information Valence, and Justice Sensitivity

Mood and Ad Processing: Examining the Impact of Program-Induced Moods on Subsequent Processing of an Antismoking Public Service Advertisement

Emotional content reduces the cognitive effort invested in processing the credibility of social (mis)information.

News source bias and sentiment on social media

(Potential) Patients Like Me: Testing the Effects of User-Generated Health Content on Social Media

Feeling good, searching the bad: Positive priming increases attention and memory for negative stimuli on webpages

The Pulse of Mood Online: Unveiling Emotional Reactions in a Dynamic Social Media Landscape

Social media emotions annotation guide (SMEmo): Development and initial validity

Computational Psychology to Embed Emotions into News or Advertisements to Increase Reader Affinity

Quantifying the Effect of Sentiment on Information Diffusion in Social Media

Images, Emotions, and Credibility: Effect of Emotional Facial Images on Perceptions of News Content Bias and Source Credibility in Social Media

Between conjecture and memento: shaping a collective emotional perception of the future

Mood and memory.

Impact of Negative Emotions on Social Campaigns Effectiveness—Measuring Dilemmas

Emotional Expressions and Brand Status

MoodSmith: Enabling Mood-Consistent Multimedia for AI-Generated Advocacy Campaigns