Abstract:Building ethical machines may involve bestowing upon them the emotional capacity to self-evaluate and repent on their actions. While reparative measures, such as apologies, are often considered as possible strategic interactions, the explicit evolution of the emotion of guilt as a behavioural phenotype is not yet well understood. Here, we study the co-evolution of social and non-social guilt of homogeneous or heterogeneous populations, including well-mixed, lattice and scale-free networks. Socially aware guilt comes at a cost, as it requires agents to make demanding efforts to observe and understand the internal state and behaviour of others, while non-social guilt only requires the awareness of the agents' own state and hence incurs no social cost. Those choosing to be non-social are however more sensitive to exploitation by other agents due to their social unawareness. Resorting to methods from evolutionary game theory, we study analytically, and through extensive numerical and agent-based simulations, whether and how such social and non-social guilt can evolve and deploy, depending on the underlying structure of the populations, or systems, of agents. The results show that, in both lattice and scale-free networks, emotional guilt prone strategies are dominant for a larger range of the guilt and social costs incurred, compared to the well-mixed population setting, leading therefore to significantly higher levels of cooperation for a wider range of the costs. In structured population settings, both social and non-social guilt can evolve and deploy through clustering with emotional prone strategies, allowing them to be protected from exploiters, especially in case of non-social (less costly) strategies. Overall, our findings provide important insights into the design and engineering of self-organised and distributed cooperative multi-agent systems.

Emotion and intergroup cooperation: How verbal expressions of guilt, shame, and pride influence behavior in a social dilemma

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Exploring the impact of positive and negative emotions on cooperative behaviour in a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

The Role of Guilt and Empathy on Prosocial Behavior

The interplay of emotion expressions and strategy in promoting cooperation in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma

Shame, guilt, and facial emotion processing: initial evidence for a positive relationship between guilt-proneness and facial emotion recognition ability

Left Amygdala and Putamen Activation Modulate Emotion Driven Decisions in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Incidental Emotions and Cooperation in a Public Goods Game

Are self-conscious emotions about the self? Testing competing theories of shame and guilt across two disparate cultures.

Why does advantageous inequity promote prosocial behavior? The roles of justice sensitivity and guilt

Cooperation across multiple game theoretical paradigms is increased by fear more than anger in selfish individuals

“In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict

Predicting Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Collective Wrongdoing: Effects of Imagined Versus Experienced Collective Guilt on Moral Behavior

Co-evolution of Social and Non-Social Guilt

Resolving Sequential Self-Control Dilemmas: The Role of Pride and Guilt

Cooperate or aggress? An opponent's tendency to cooperate modulates the neural dynamics of interpersonal cooperation

Rejecting an intergroup apology attenuates perceived differences between victim and perpetrator groups in morality and power

Prosocial emotions predict individual differences in economic decision-making during ultimatum game with dynamic reciprocal contexts

Proud to Be Dishonest: Emotional Consequences of Altruistic Versus Egoistic Dishonesty

To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive

Studies on the functions and mechanisms of shame and pride: A systematic examination of the relationship between shame/pride and concealment/exposure behaviors.