Abstract:Extensive interdisciplinary literatures have built on the seminal spatial dilemmas model, which depicts the evolution of cooperation on regular lattices, with strategies propagating locally by relative fitness. In this model agents may cooperate with neighbors, paying an individual cost to enhance their collective welfare, or they may exploit cooperative neighbors and diminish collective welfare. Recent research has extended the model in numerous ways, incorporating behavioral noise, implementing other network topologies or adaptive networks, and employing alternative dynamics of replication. Although the underlying dilemma arises from two distinct dimensions-the gains for exploiting cooperative partners (Greed) and the cost of cooperating with exploitative partners (Fear)-most work following from the spatial dilemmas model has argued or assumed that the dilemma can be represented with a single parameter: This research has typically examined Greed or Fear in isolation, or a composite such as the K-index of Cooperation or the ratio of the benefit to cost of cooperation. We challenge this claim on theoretical grounds-showing that embedding interaction in networks generally leads Greed and Fear to have divergent, interactive, and highly nonlinear effects on cooperation at the macro level, even when individuals respond identically to Greed and Fear. Using computational experiments, we characterize both dynamic local behavior and long run outcomes across regions of this space. We also simulate interventions to investigate changes of Greed and Fear over time, showing how model behavior changes asymmetrically as boundaries in payoff space are crossed, leading some interventions to have irreversible effects on cooperation. We then replicate our experiments on inter-organizational network data derived from links through shared directors among 2,400 large US corporations, thus demonstrating our findings for Greed and Fear on a naturally-occurring network. In closing, we discuss implications of our main findings regarding Greed and Fear for the problem of cooperation on inter-organizational networks.

Cooperation across multiple game theoretical paradigms is increased by fear more than anger in selfish individuals

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Left Amygdala and Putamen Activation Modulate Emotion Driven Decisions in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Incidental Emotions and Cooperation in a Public Goods Game

Exploring the impact of positive and negative emotions on cooperative behaviour in a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Shifting prosocial intuitions: neurocognitive evidence for a value-based account of group-based cooperation

Cooperate or aggress? An opponent's tendency to cooperate modulates the neural dynamics of interpersonal cooperation

Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations

Social Value Induction and Cooperation in the Centipede Game

Prosocial emotions predict individual differences in economic decision-making during ultimatum game with dynamic reciprocal contexts

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

The Role of Personal Values and Empathy in a Cooperative Game

Caring Cooperators and Powerful Punishers: Differential Effects of Induced Care and Power Motivation on Different Types of Economic Decision Making

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games

Can Empathy Promote Cooperation when Status and Money Matter?

Moral Emotions and Social Economic Games in Paranoia

Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' Contributions.

Parochial cooperation in nested intergroup dilemmas is reduced when it harms out-groups.

Risk aversion can promote cooperation

Evolution of cooperation driven by the diversity of emotions