Increasing Transparency in Science through Scaffolding

Scott E. McIntyre
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591052
2015-09-01
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Abstract:Scientific literacy is poor in the United States and most have to rely on authority (media or scientists) for interpretations of scientific validity. Three reasons contributing to this are low formal science education enrollment and requirements, an opaque peer review system, and inaccessibility to research manuscripts. Scaffolding STEM education using restructured post publication abstracts may help those with little science and statistics education to informally learn best practices in scientific research while assisting with evaluation of internal, statistical and external validity of scientific research. For this experiment, paper prototypes of an internet based autodidactic electronic STEM education and research review system were used. Scaffolding allowed college students without statistics or scientific research methods education to extract more information faster than those with such education using full research articles, F (1, 26) = 56.88, p < .001, η 2 = .69.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?