Abstract:Despite growing awareness of the importance of incorporating integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) learning into K‐12 education, formal classroom implementation still faces obstacles. Teachers lack the knowledge and skills, especially design‐thinking competence, required to design an interdisciplinary STEM curriculum. The goal of this study was to investigate different scaffolding modes that may influence the design‐thinking competence development of STEM teachers. Twenty‐four preservice teachers participated in this study, which was carried out in an online STEM preservice teacher training environment. The participants were assigned to six groups of two cohorts. Each group designed a STEM learning module. To support their online design meetings, the three groups from the static scaffolding cohort (SSC) received pre‐defined guiding questions, while the other three groups from the adaptive scaffolding cohort (ASC) received contingent scaffolding from a human tutor. The Log data on the participants' conversations in the design meetings were collected and analysed using the epistemic network analysis (ENA) approach. The results revealed that the SSC and ASC had divergent design‐thinking development trajectories and established distinct design‐thinking patterns. Conversation analysis of the two cohorts confirmed the findings of the ENA analysis and provided evidence that the two scaffolding modes can help address challenges to collaborative STEM learning design and cultivate design‐thinking competence from different perspectives. Practitioner NotesWhat is already known about this topic Integrated and interdisciplinary STEM curriculum should be incorporated into K‐12 education.Teachers lack the design‐thinking competence required to design an integrated and interdisciplinary STEM curriculum.What this paper adds Static scaffolding and adaptive scaffolding help STEM preservice teachers to develop process‐oriented and result‐oriented design‐thinking patterns, respectively.STEM preservice teachers present divergent design‐thinking development trajectories during collaborative STEM learning design under these two scaffolding modes.Implications for practice and/or policy Integrated STEM learning design should leverage the complexity in the design process and creativity in the design solutions.Different scaffolding modes can complement each other in support of design‐thinking competence development in collaborative STEM learning design practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] uracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education

Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis to Synthesize the Influence of Contexts of Scaffolding Use on Cognitive Outcomes in STEM Education

Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for Stem Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis

Computer-Based Scaffolding Targeting Individual Versus Groups in Problem-Centered Instruction for STEM Education: Meta-analysis

The Effectiveness of Self-Regulated Learning Scaffolds on Academic Performance in Computer-Based Learning Environments: a Meta-Analysis

Effects of Scaffolding in Digital Game-Based Learning on Student’s Achievement: a Three-Level Meta-analysis

Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments

Design and Optimization of Scaffolding in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Effects of regulated learning scaffolding on regulation strategies and academic performance: A meta-analysis.

The Effects of Three Scaffoldings on Computer-Supported, Robot-Assisted Collaborative Programming in Higher Education

Analyzing Adaptive Scaffolds that Help Students Develop Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors

LESCA: Scaffolding and its impact on the higher cognitive levels and emotions of the student

Providing students with agency to self-scaffold in a computational science and engineering course

Scaffolding Design Thinking in Online STEM Preservice Teacher Training

Effects of scaffolding and inner speech on learning motivation, flexible thinking and academic achievement in the technology-enhanced learning environment

Examining the Impact of Teacher Scaffolding in the Knowledge Building Environment: Insights from Students’ Interaction Patterns, Social Epistemic Networks, and Academic Performance

Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research

The effect of scaffolding programming games and attitudes towards programming on the development of Computational Thinking

Increasing Transparency in Science through Scaffolding

The Effects of Worked-Out Example and Metacognitive Scaffolding on Problem-Solving Programming