Abstract:Despite its pivotal importance in enterprise management, cash flow forecasting gets little attention from academics perhaps because few of them have access to internal processes and data. In this article, however, the authors explain how cash flow forecasting is organized at Bayer, a large multinational company headquartered in Germany, and which factors influence the accuracy of its forecasts. The research focuses on cash flow forecasts based on the direct method, prepared three times a yearat Bayer, involving about 62,000 individual forecasting items each time. These forecasts form the basis of the company's liquidity and financial risk management, in particular, its foreign exchange risk hedging. The authors explain how local managers in Bayer's entities across the world derive the forecasts, i.e., what information they use as input, how they validate it, and how they deal with potential bias caused by managerial incentive systems. They also analyze whether forecasting processes are affected by characteristics such as business area, size, region, or specific local conditions, and ultimately whether forecasting practices and entity characteristics affect forecast accuracy. The findings show that cash flow forecasting procedures vary substantially across Bayer. While the central finance department gives general guidance on the required cash flow forecasting output and provides direction on the input to be used, there are no detailed instructions on how forecasts are to be prepared. Instead, local managers are free to determine their own forecasting practices. They use different forecasting inputs and validate forecasting inputs and output with different intensities, and they also differ in how they treat possible biases in input data. These findings document the limits of standardization and central control in large multinational corporations resulting from local managers’ need for flexibility to cope with the heterogeneity and dynamism of their environments. At the same time, however, local differentiation increases complexity and may increase errors. Quantitative analysis of forecasting errors shows that forecasts of receipts from customers (cash inflows) are more accurate than forecasts of payments to suppliers (cash outflows). Moreover, forecasting practices affect forecast accuracy. Outflow forecasts are more accurate if managers intensively validate forecasting input; inflow forecasts, if they eliminate input biases that may result from internal target setting or from other managerial incentives, and if they carefully validate their forecasting output. The study provides several insights. Cash flow forecasting in a large multinational corporation is a complex system of interlaced processes, taking place in many organizational sub‐ units and located in different environments with different backgrounds. Forecasting processes depend on entity characteristics. Managers at smaller, less complex entities tend to communicate closely with local counterparts and to verify forecasting output, while managers at entities whose liquidity is managed by the central finance department often use only rough assumptions about payment terms of cash inflows and outflows. Quantitative analysis supports the contention that invoices issued to customers can be forecasted more accurately than invoices received from suppliers. Forecasting practices affect forecast accuracy. Forecasts of invoices from suppliers are more accurate if managers intensively validate the forecasting input and prepare their own calculations rather than simply accept at face value input data provided by other departments.

What Determines Managers' Perceptions of Cash Flow Forecasting Quality? Evidence From a Multinational Corporation

Measuring The Management Of Cash Flows From Operating Activities-Evidence From Chinese Capital Markets

Processes and Accuracy of Cash Flow Forecasting: A Case Study of a Multinational Corporation

Managers’ incentives for issuing cash flow forecasts

Determinants of information system quality and data quality in management accounting

Cash Flow Management, Incentives, and Market Pricing

Do Managers Always Know Better? The Relative Accuracy of Management and Analyst Forecasts

Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies

The relationship between cash flow forecast and earnings management in firms

Managerial Academic Experience, External Monitoring And Financial Reporting Quality

The Use of Forecast Accuracy Indicators to Improve Planning Quality: Insights from a Case Study

Cash flow management and its effect on firm performance: Empirical evidence on non-financial firms of China

Empirical analysis of daily cash flow time series and its implications for forecasting

Does managerial ability affect the quality of environmental financial disclosure?

Assessing the Influence of Budgeting and Forecasting Accuracy on Financial Performance in Corporate Accounting using SPSS Statistics

Developing a planning model to estimate future cash flows

Managerial Ability and the Quality of Firms’ Information Environment

Empowering cash managers to achieve cost savings by improving predictive accuracy

Valuation Models Applied to Value-Based Management. Application to the Case of UK Companies with Problems

Performance of financial hedging and earnings management under diverse corporate information quality

To What Extent have Cash Flows been Managed? Evidence from China