Abstract:Abstract Background Despite endorsement by medical journals, reporting guidelines have only modestly affected reporting quality. We aimed to identify facilitators and barriers that researchers might encounter when using reporting guidelines. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, AMED, WHO Global Index Medicus, SciELO, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Chinese Medical Journal Database, OSF, and MiRoR for research that collected qualitative data to explore researchers’ experiences of using reporting guidelines, published after 1996 in English, Chinese, Spanish, or Portuguese. We appraised studies using CASP-Qual. For thematic synthesis, we applied descriptive codes to all sentences that reported qualitative findings, then aggregated codes inductively into descriptive themes that captured the codes’ meaning. We interpreted and contextualised possible facilitators and barriers from these descriptive themes to create analytic themes. Results From 18 eligible studies, we developed 12 analytic themes. 1) Researchers may not understand guidance as intended. 2) Researchers report many reasons for using reporting guidelines, and that some are more important than others. 3) Researchers use reporting guidelines for different tasks and want guidance to be delivered in ways that fit their needs. 4) Using reporting guidelines has costs which researchers may feel outweigh benefits. 5) Reporting guidelines may need to be revised and updated for different reasons. 6) Researchers report feeling uncertain or worried if they are unable to report all items. 7) Awareness and accessibility may limit reporting guideline usage. 8) Reporting guidelines may be most beneficial to less experienced researchers, but these researchers may find them harder to use. 9) Researchers seek design advice but reporting guidelines may not be the right place to find it. 10) A reporting guideline's scope must be well-balanced and well-defined. 11) Researchers may have to use multiple reporting guidelines, multiplying complexity and costs. 12) Researchers may use checklists but never read the full guidance. Discussion Few reporting guidelines have been evaluated qualitatively. Many studies used surveys which resulted in thin data and were subject to recall bias. Nevertheless, we identified many potential barriers and facilitators. Our findings will help guideline developers and advocates improve reporting guidance dissemination.

Managing Social Media Use: Whither Social Media Guidelines in News Organizations?

Journalist Use of Social Media: Guidelines for Media Organizations

Journalist Use of Social Media: Guidelines for Media Organizations.

Design Factors of Ethics and Responsibility in Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature and Expert Review of Guiding Principles

Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media

Deontological guidelines for digital journalism

Social Media News: A Comparative Analysis of the Journalistic Uses of Twitter

Public Employee Use of Social Media at Work: Competency, Collaboration, and Communication of Workplace Policy

The Development of Social Media Guidelines for Psychologists and for Regulatory Use

Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations

Two Goals, One Thing: Ensuring Short-Term Political Efficacy Without Sacrificing Social Responsibility Crossing Powerful Social Media Platforms

Disclosure Standards for Social Media and Generative Artificial Intelligence Research: Toward Transparency and Replicability

The Responsibility of Social Media to Truth, Reason and Democracy

Ethics Guidelines for Immersive Journalism

What facilitators and barriers might researchers encounter when using reporting guidelines? Part 1: A thematic synthesis

Changing or Reinforcing the “Rules of the Game”: A Field Theory Perspective on the Impacts of Automated Journalism on Media Practitioners

International standards of journalism in the context of digitalization of the media space

SoK: Content Moderation in Social Media, from Guidelines to Enforcement, and Research to Practice

Governing principles: Articulating values in social media platform policies

Public attitudes towards social media field experiments

AI Ethics in Journalism (Studies): An Evolving Field Between Research and Practice