Abstract:For enhancing wild bees in intensive apple orchards, hedges and perennial flower strips are complementary in providing flower resources. Yet, flower strips bloom more constantly and during periods of flower scarcity, and thus attract a higher diversity of bees than hedges. Perennial flower strips of different age classes should be preferred over annual strips, at best in a network with some well‐maintained hedges, as perennial flower strips of different age attract different bee communities and thus potentially a higher bee diversity on the landscape level. Wild bees importantly pollinate both crop and wild plants. Yet, in intensive agricultural landscapes, wild bees are rare due to resource limitations of nectar and pollen. Flower strips and hedges are often used as resource enhancements for wild bees to overcome this shortage, but provide floral resources only during specific time periods. To sustain diverse and stable bee communities, bee‐attractive flowers need to be available during the entire growing season. This may be achieved by combining flower strips and hedges to complement each other and provide continuous floral resources. Over three subsequent years, we compared the phenology of flower and wild bee communities in perennial flower strips, hedges and improved hedges (complemented with a sown herb layer) in conventional apple orchards in Southern Germany, a pollination‐dependent crop system. Hedges provided floral resources in the early season while the flower strips took over later in the season. Bees visited the hedges mostly from March to June, whereas they visited the flower strips from June to August in the first year, and in the second year already from April onwards. Flower strips were visited with an overall higher abundance and species richness than both the hedges and the improved hedges. Synthesis and application. For enhancing wild bees in intensive apple orchards, hedges and perennial flower strips are complementary in providing flower resources. Yet, flower strips bloom more constantly and during periods of flower scarcity, and thus attract a higher diversity of bees than hedges. Perennial flower strips of different age classes should be preferred over annual strips, at best in a network with some well‐maintained hedges, as perennial flower strips of different age attract different bee communities and thus potentially a higher bee diversity on the landscape level. Zusammenfassung Wildbienen sind für die Bestäubung sowohl von Nutz‐ als auch von Wildpflanzen wichtig. In intensiven Agrarlandschaften sind sie jedoch selten geworden, da meist nur wenig Blüten als Nektar‐ und Pollenquellen zur Verfügung stehen. Blühstreifen und Hecken können diesen Mangel an Blühressourcen ausgleichen. Jedoch bieten beide nur zu bestimmten Zeiten Blüten. Um diverse und stabile Bienengemeinschaften zu erhalten, müssen bienenattraktive Blüten jedoch während der gesamten Vegetationsperiode zur Verfügung stehen. Die Lösung könnte sein, Blühstreifen und Hecken miteinander zu kombinieren, da sich die Blühzeitpunkte gegenseitig ergänzen und so ein kontinuierliches Blütenangebot entstehen könnte. In drei aufeinanderfolgenden Jahren verglichen wir die Phänologie von Blüten‐ und Wildbienengemeinschaften in mehrjährigen Blühstreifen, Hecken und aufgewerteten Hecken (ergänzt durch eine eingesäte Krautschicht) in konventionellen Apfelplantagen in Süddeutschland, einem bestäubungsabhängigen Anbausystem. Die Hecken lieferten im Frühling Blühressourcen, die Blühstreifen später in der Saison. Bienen besuchten die Hecken hauptsächlich von März bis Juni, während sie die Blühstreifen im ersten Jahr von Juni bis August und im zweiten Jahr bereits ab April aufsuchten. Die Bienenabundanz und ‐artenvielfalt war in den Blühstreifen insgesamt höher als in den Hecken und aufgewerteten Hecken. Synthese und Anwendung. Hecken und mehrjährige Blühstreifen ergänzen sich bei der Bereitstellung von Blütenressourcen und damit bei der Förderung von Wildbienen in intensiven Apfelplantagen. Allerdings blühen Blühstreifen länger und konstanter und das während Phasen, in denen ansonsten kaum Blüten vorhanden sind, und ziehen daher mehr Bienen an als Hecken. Mehrjährige Blühstreifen unterschiedlicher Altersklassen sollten einjährigen Einsaaten vorgezogen werden ‐bestenfalls in einem Netzwerk mit arten‐ und blütenreichen Hecken ‐ da mehrjährige Blühstreifen über die Jahre hinweg unterschiedliche Bienengemeinschaften und damit potenziell eine höhere Bienendiversität auf Landschaftsebene anziehen.

Diverse landscapes have a higher abundance and species richness of spring wild bees by providing complementary floral resources over bees’ foraging periods

Forested landscapes promote richness and abundance of native bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) in Wisconsin apple orchards

Temporal-spatial Dynamics of Wild Bee Diversity in Agricultural Landscapes in Changping District, Beijing

Contrasting Effects of Natural Shrubland and Plantation Forests on Bee Assemblages at Neighboring Apple Orchards in Beijing, China

[Effects of landscape complexity and local management on bee pollinator diversity in apple orchards in Changping District, Beijing, China]

Effects of ground flowering plant traits on the diversity of wild bees in apple orchards during flowering

Bees go up, flowers go down: Increased resource limitation from late spring to summer in agricultural landscapes

Improving Habitat Quality at the Local and Landscape Scales Increases Wild Bee Assemblages and Associated Pollination Services in Apple Orchards in China

Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees in apple orchards

Effects of Plant Diversity, Vegetation Composition, and Habitat Type on Different Functional Trait Groups of Wild Bees in Rural Beijing

Wild bee communities benefit from temporal complementarity of hedges and flower strips in apple orchards

Woodland, cropland and hedgerows promote pollinator abundance in intensive grassland landscapes, with saturating benefits of flower cover

Patch utilization and flower visitations by wild bees in a honey bee-dominated, grassland landscape

Wild Bee Conservation within Urban Gardens and Nurseries: Effects of Local and Landscape Management

Functional trait mismatch between native and introduced bee pollinators servicing a global fruit crop

Bee Abundance and Soil Nitrogen Availability Interactively Modulate Apple Quality and Quantity in Intensive Agricultural Landscapes of China

Wild bee species abundance and richness across an urban–rural gradient

Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment

Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

A ‘Landscape physiology’ approach for assessing bee health highlights the benefits of floral landscape enrichment and semi-natural habitats

Natural Riparian Vegetation As Corridors to Promote Bee Diversity and Pollination Services in an Urban Landscape