Abstract:We investigated the potential of wildflower strips to modify plant‐pollinator networks. By comparing networks from wildflower strips and other agricultural field margin habitats, we found that increasing flower species richness significantly reduced network connectance, a measure of network complexity, and marginally reduced bee species' niche overlap, a proxy for insect competition. These findings are of general relevance in ecology and epidemiology, as we provide a new framework for the development of conservation measures where ecological interactions and network structure are taken into consideration beyond the current target of increasing species richness and abundance. Ecological restoration programs are established to reverse land degradation, mitigate biodiversity loss, and reinstate ecosystem services. Following recent agricultural intensification that led to a decrease in flower diversity and density in rural areas and subsequently to the decline of many insects, conservation measures targeted at pollinators have been established, including sown wildflower strips (WFS) along field margins. Historically successful in establishing a high density of generalist bees and increasing pollinator diversity, the impact of enhanced flower provision on wider ecological interactions and the structure of pollinator networks has been rarely investigated. Here, we tested the effects of increasing flower species richness and flower density in agricultural landscapes on bee‐plant interaction networks. We measured plant species richness and flower density and surveyed honeybee and bumblebee visits on flowers across a range of field margins on 10 UK farms that applied different pollinator conservation measures. We found that both flower species richness and flower density significantly increased bee abundance, in early and late summer, respectively. At the network level, we found that higher flower species richness did not significantly alter bee species' generality indices, but significantly reduced network connectance and marginally reduced niche overlap across honeybees and bumblebee species, a proxy for insect competition. While higher connectance and niche overlap is believed to strengthen network robustness and often is the aim for the restoration of pollinator networks, we argue that carefully designed WFS may benefit bees by partitioning their foraging niche, limiting competition for resources and the potential for disease transmission via shared floral use. We also discuss the need to extend WFS and their positive effects into spring when wild bee populations are established.

A ‘Landscape physiology’ approach for assessing bee health highlights the benefits of floral landscape enrichment and semi-natural habitats

Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment

Landscape and land use affect composition and nutritional values of bees' food

Landscape-modified Concentration Effect and Waylaying Effect of Bees and Their Consequences on Pollination of Mass-Flowering Plants in Agricultural Ecosystems

Semi-natural habitats mitigate the impact of food shortage on honey bees in farmlands

Organic farming and annual flower strips reduce parasite prevalence in honeybees and boost colony growth in agricultural landscapes

Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

Impact of landscape configuration and composition on pollinator communities across different European biogeographic regions

Land use changes associated with declining honey bee health across temperate North America

A spatially extended model to assess the role of landscape structure on the pollination service of Apis mellifera

Natural Riparian Vegetation As Corridors to Promote Bee Diversity and Pollination Services in an Urban Landscape

Local and Landscape Factors Influence Plant-Pollinator Networks and Bee Foraging Behavior across an Urban Corridor

Diverse landscapes have a higher abundance and species richness of spring wild bees by providing complementary floral resources over bees’ foraging periods

Seasonal bee communities vary in their responses to resources at local and landscape scales: implication for land managers

Flowering plant communities mediate the effects of habitat composition and configuration on wild pollinator communities

Wild Bee Conservation in Viticulture: Effects of Semi‐Natural Habitats, Organic Management, and Fungicide Reduction

Assessing the contribution of lawns and semi-natural meadows to bee, wasp, and flower fly communities across different landscapes

Influence of Pollen Nutrition on Honey Bee Health: Do Pollen Quality and Diversity Matter?

From marginal croplands to natural habitats: A methodological framework for assessing the restoration potential to enhance wild-bee pollination in agricultural landscapes

Landscape fragmentation constrains bumblebee nutritional ecology and foraging dynamics

Wild Bee Conservation within Urban Gardens and Nurseries: Effects of Local and Landscape Management