Accuracy and Usefulness of Select Methods for Assessing Complete Collection of 24‐Hour Urine: A Systematic Review

Katherine A John,Mary E Cogswell,Norm R Campbell,Caryl A Nowson,Branka Legetic,Anselm J M Hennis,Sheena M Patel,Katherine A. John,Mary E. Cogswell,Norm R. Campbell,Caryl A. Nowson,Anselm J. M. Hennis,Sheena M. Patel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12763
2016-01-03
Abstract:Twenty-four-hour urine collection is the recommended method for estimating sodium intake. To investigate the strengths and limitations of methods used to assess completion of 24-hour urine collection, the authors systematically reviewed the literature on the accuracy and usefulness of methods vs para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) recovery (referent). The percentage of incomplete collections, based on PABA, was 6% to 47% (n=8 studies). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying incomplete collection using creatinine criteria (n=4 studies) was 6% to 63% and 57% to 99.7%, respectively. The most sensitive method for removing incomplete collections was a creatinine index <0.7. In pooled analysis (≥2 studies), mean urine creatinine excretion and volume were higher among participants with complete collection (P<.05); whereas, self-reported collection time did not differ by completion status. Compared with participants with incomplete collection, mean 24-hour sodium excretion was 19.6 mmol higher (n=1781 specimens, 5 studies) in patients with complete collection. Sodium excretion may be underestimated by inclusion of incomplete 24-hour urine collections. None of the current approaches reliably assess completion of 24-hour urine collection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?