Evaluation and Validation of 24-hour Urinary Sodium Excretion by 3 Estimating Methods

Yi SUN,Jian BO,Ya-guang PENG,Yan HOU,Hui CHEN,Xing-yu WANG,Lu YIN,Yang WANG,Yuan-li LIU,Wei LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2016.11.017
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To validate and evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of 24-hour urinary sodium excretion (USE) in Chinese population by 3 estimating approaches of Kawasaki, INTERSALT and Tanaka methods. <br> Methods: Our research was a sub-study of “prospective urban rural epidemiology (PURE)”. A total of 120 participants were selected including 60 from urban and 60 from rural areas. Morning fasting urine and 24-hour urine specimens were collected to examine the levels of sodium, potassium and creatinine in each participant. The consistencies between estimated 24-hour USE and real measured 24-hour USE were compared by Bland-Altman plots in each method respectively. <br> Results: There were 116 participants were enrolled for ifnal analysis. The mean level of sodium excretion was 6343 mg/day (about 16.2 g/day of salt). Among 3 methods, Kawasaki method had the minimum mean exponent bias (estimated 24-hour USE minus real measured 24-h USE) as -740 mg/day, the mean exponent bias in Tanaka method was -2305 mg/day, in INTERSALT method was -2797 mg/day which was the maximum. Although Kawasaki method had the minimum mean exponent bias, Bland-Altman plots showed that the differences in 9 (7.8%) patients were still beyond the mean ±1.96 standard deviation. <br> Conclusion: Kawasaki, INTERSALT and Tanaka methods have underestimation and limitation for evaluating 24-hour&nbsp;USE in Chinese population; it is necessary to develop a suitable method for measuring 24-hour USE in order to assess the salt intake amount in Chinese population.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?