Fractional exhaled nitric oxide for the management of asthma in adults: a systematic review

Munira Essat,Sue Harnan,Tim Gomersall,Paul Tappenden,Ruth Wong,Ian Pavord,Rod Lawson,Mark L. Everard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01882-2015
IF: 24.3
2016-02-04
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide ( F eNO ) measured in a clinical setting for the management of asthma in adults. 13 electronic databases were searched and studies were selected against predefined inclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted using QUADAS-2. Class effect meta-analyses were performed. Six studies were included. Despite high levels of heterogeneity in multiple study characteristics, exploratory class effect meta-analyses were conducted. Four studies reported a wider definition of exacerbation rates (major or severe exacerbation) with a pooled rate ratio of 0.80 (95% CI 0.63–1.02). Two studies reported rates of severe exacerbations (requiring oral corticosteroid use) with a pooled rate ratio of 0.89 (95% CI 0.43–1.72). Inhaled corticosteroid use was reported by four studies, with a pooled standardised mean difference of −0.24 (95% CI −0.56–0.07). No statistically significant differences for health-related quality of life or asthma control were found. F eNO guided management showed no statistically significant benefit in terms of severe exacerbations or inhaled corticosteroid use, but showed a statistically significant reduction in exacerbations of any severity. However, further research is warranted to clearly define which management protocols (including cut-off points) offer best efficacy and which patient groups would benefit the most.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?