Abstract:BACKGROUND:Sample size planning for longitudinal data is crucial when designing mediation studies because sufficient statistical power is not only required in grant applications and peer-reviewed publications, but is essential to reliable research results. However, sample size determination is not straightforward for mediation analysis of longitudinal design.METHODS:To facilitate planning the sample size for longitudinal mediation studies with a multilevel mediation model, this article provides the sample size required to achieve 80% power by simulations under various sizes of the mediation effect, within-subject correlations and numbers of repeated measures. The sample size calculation is based on three commonly used mediation tests: Sobel's method, distribution of product method and the bootstrap method.RESULTS:Among the three methods of testing the mediation effects, Sobel's method required the largest sample size to achieve 80% power. Bootstrapping and the distribution of the product method performed similarly and were more powerful than Sobel's method, as reflected by the relatively smaller sample sizes. For all three methods, the sample size required to achieve 80% power depended on the value of the ICC (i.e., within-subject correlation). A larger value of ICC typically required a larger sample size to achieve 80% power. Simulation results also illustrated the advantage of the longitudinal study design. The sample size tables for most encountered scenarios in practice have also been published for convenient use.CONCLUSIONS:Extensive simulations study showed that the distribution of the product method and bootstrapping method have superior performance to the Sobel's method, but the product method was recommended to use in practice in terms of less computation time load compared to the bootstrapping method. A R package has been developed for the product method of sample size determination in mediation longitudinal study design.

A statistical method for synthesizing mediation analyses using the product of coefficient approach across multiple trials

Sample Size Determination for Mediation Analysis of Longitudinal Data.

Causal mediation analysis: From simple to more robust strategies for estimation of marginal natural (in)direct effects

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Context of Clinical Research.

Robust Mediation Analysis Based on Median Regression.

Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method

Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods

Determining Power and Sample Size for Simple and Complex Mediation Models

Causal Mediation Programs in R, Mplus, SAS, SPSS, and Stata

Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models

Statistical Mediation Analysis for Models with a Binary Mediator and a Binary Outcome: the Differences Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis

A Bayesian approach for estimating mediation effects with missing data

Power of Mediation Effects Using Bootstrap Resampling

Causal mediation analysis in presence of multiple mediators uncausally related

Causal Mediation Analysis With a Binary Outcome and Multiple Continuous or Ordinal Mediators: Simulations and Application to an Alcohol Intervention

Efficient Adjusted Joint Significance Test and Sobel-Type Confidence Interval for Mediation Effect

Estimating Confidence Intervals of Mediating Effects by Using the Distribution of the Product, Bootstrap and Markov chain Monte Carlo Methods

Statistical Approaches for Enhancing Causal Interpretation of the M to Y Relation in Mediation Analysis

Equivalence of Two Least-Squares Estimators for Indirect Effects

Increasing statistical power in mediation models without increasing sample size