Abstract:<span>In genome-wide epigenetic studies, it is of great scientific interest to assess whether the effect of an exposure on a clinical outcome is mediated through DNA methylations. However, statistical inference for causal mediation effects is challenged by the fact that one needs to test a large number of composite null hypotheses across the whole epigenome. Two popular tests, the Wald-type Sobel's test and the joint significant test using the traditional null distribution are underpowered and thus can miss important scientific discoveries. In this article, we show that the null distribution of Sobel's test is not the standard normal distribution and the null distribution of the joint significant test is not uniform under the composite null of no mediation effect, especially in finite samples and under the singular point null case that the exposure has no effect on the mediator and the mediator has no effect on the outcome. Our results explain why these two tests are underpowered, and more importantly motivate us to develop a more powerful divide-aggregate composite-null test (DACT) for the composite null hypothesis of no mediation effect by leveraging epigenome-wide data. We adopted Efron's empirical null framework for assessing statistical significance of the DACT test. We showed analytically that the proposed DACT method had improved power, and could well control Type I error rate. Our extensive simulation studies showed that, in finite samples, the DACT method properly controlled the Type I error rate and outperformed Sobel's test and the joint significance test for detecting mediation effects. We applied the DACT method to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study which included men who were aged 21 to 80 years at entry. We identified multiple DNA methylation CpG sites that might mediate the effect of smoking on lung function with effect sizes ranging from –0.18 to –0.79 and false discovery rate controlled at the level 0.05, including the CpG sites in the genes AHRR and F2RL3. Our sensitivity analysis found small residual correlations (less than 0.01) of the error terms between the outcome and mediator regressions, suggesting that our results are robust to unmeasured confounding factors. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.</span>

Efficient Adjusted Joint Significance Test and Sobel-Type Confidence Interval for Mediation Effect

The Impact of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders on Statistical Inference of Mediation Effects and Tools for Sensitivity Analysis

Testing Mediation Effects Using Logic of Boolean Matrices

Robust Mediation Analysis Based on Median Regression.

An Online Updating Approach for Estimating and Testing Mediation Effects with Big Data Streams

Mediation Analysis and Effect Size Measurement： Retrospect and Prospect

Reprint: Statistical inference for linear mediation models with high-dimensional mediators and application to studying stock reaction to COVID-19 pandemic

Adaptive Bootstrap Tests for Composite Null Hypotheses in the Mediation Pathway Analysis

Sample Size Determination for Mediation Analysis of Longitudinal Data.

Large-Scale Hypothesis Testing for Causal Mediation Effects with Applications in Genome-wide Epigenetic Studies

Power of Testing for Exposure Effects under Incomplete Mediation

Improved Tests for Mediation

Speeding up interval estimation for R2-based mediation effect of high-dimensional mediators via cross-fitting

Interpretable sensitivity analysis for the Baron-Kenny approach to mediation with unmeasured confounding

Bayesian Hypothesis Testing of Mediation: Methods and the Impact of Prior Odds Specifications.

Indirect Effects in Sequential Mediation Models: Evaluating Methods for Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Formation

Handling Measurement Error and Omitted Confounders Considering Informativeness of the Confounding Effect under Mediation Modeling

A Robust Bootstrap Test for Mediation Analysis

Improving Precision in Mediation Analysis Through Efficient Use of Case Data

A default Bayesian hypothesis test for mediation

Power of Mediation Effects Using Bootstrap Resampling