Abstract:BACKGROUND:Sample size planning for longitudinal data is crucial when designing mediation studies because sufficient statistical power is not only required in grant applications and peer-reviewed publications, but is essential to reliable research results. However, sample size determination is not straightforward for mediation analysis of longitudinal design.METHODS:To facilitate planning the sample size for longitudinal mediation studies with a multilevel mediation model, this article provides the sample size required to achieve 80% power by simulations under various sizes of the mediation effect, within-subject correlations and numbers of repeated measures. The sample size calculation is based on three commonly used mediation tests: Sobel's method, distribution of product method and the bootstrap method.RESULTS:Among the three methods of testing the mediation effects, Sobel's method required the largest sample size to achieve 80% power. Bootstrapping and the distribution of the product method performed similarly and were more powerful than Sobel's method, as reflected by the relatively smaller sample sizes. For all three methods, the sample size required to achieve 80% power depended on the value of the ICC (i.e., within-subject correlation). A larger value of ICC typically required a larger sample size to achieve 80% power. Simulation results also illustrated the advantage of the longitudinal study design. The sample size tables for most encountered scenarios in practice have also been published for convenient use.CONCLUSIONS:Extensive simulations study showed that the distribution of the product method and bootstrapping method have superior performance to the Sobel's method, but the product method was recommended to use in practice in terms of less computation time load compared to the bootstrapping method. A R package has been developed for the product method of sample size determination in mediation longitudinal study design.

A Robust Bootstrap Test for Mediation Analysis

Robust Mediation Analysis Based on Median Regression.

Robust Mediation Analysis: The R Package robmed

Methods for Evaluating Mediation Effects: Rationale and Comparison

Monte Carlo Based Statistical Power Analysis for Mediation Models: Methods and Software

Adaptive Bootstrap Tests for Composite Null Hypotheses in the Mediation Pathway Analysis

Power of Mediation Effects Using Bootstrap Resampling

Sample Size Determination for Mediation Analysis of Longitudinal Data.

Improved Tests for Mediation

A framework for mediation analysis with massive data

A Nearly Similar Powerful Test for Mediation

A default Bayesian hypothesis test for mediation

Robust Inference for Mediated Effects in Partially Linear Models

Robust and Flexible Estimation of Stochastic Mediation Effects: A Proposed Method and Example in a Randomized Trial Setting

Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions

Mediation Analysis With Missing Data Through Multiple Imputation And Bootstrap

Comparing Alternative Corrections for Bias in the Bias-Corrected Bootstrap Test of Mediation

Multilevel Analysis of Mediation, Moderation, and Nonlinear Effects in Small Samples, Using Expected a Posteriori Estimates of Factor Scores

Testing Mediation Effects Using Logic of Boolean Matrices

The Failings of Conventional Mediation Analysis and a Design-Based Alternative

Latent Class Dynamic Mediation Model with Application to Smoking Cessation Data