Character traits: Scientific virtue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7597-139a

IF: 64.8

2016-04-01

Nature

Abstract:Elite scientists generally agree on what character traits make for excellent science.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Character Strengths: the Psychological Capital to Build a Good Life

Ning ZHANG,Yu-Qing ZHANG

2010-01-01

Advances in Psychological Science

Abstract:Character strengths are a family of positive dispositions reflected through one's thoughts,feelings and actions.Research on character strengths is one central theme of positive psychology.Researches have shown that the Values in Action Classification of Strengths (VIA-CS) are ubiquitously recognized across different cultures and that certain character strengths are significantly correlated with peoples' psychological health such as children's problem behavior and desired developmental outcomes,subjective well-being and the process of posttraumatic growth.Recent research documented that hereditary,age,gender and one's religiosity are the main factors that influence the presence and development of character strengths.Direction for future research and the application of character strengths in children and adolescents development and education are also discussed.
Paragons of character-Character strengths and well-being of moral, creative, and religious exemplars

Fabian Gander,Lisa Wagner,Valentina Vylobkova,André Kretzschmar,Willibald Ruch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12907

Abstract:Objective: Which traits best describe individuals who are recognized as exemplary in different domains? And can self-rated positively valued personality traits distinguish such individuals from the general population? Background: The study of exemplary individuals' personality traits traditionally focused on general and broad traits. Using character strengths, which are narrower and designed to describe desirable behavior, could provide new insights. Method: In this study, we examined 204 outstanding individuals-exemplars who received or were nominated for a public award recognizing their exemplary behavior (e.g., a Carnegie Rescuers Award; n = 119), individuals holding a patent (n = 62), and individuals living in a religious order (n = 23). We compared these exemplars to comparison samples matched based on demographic variables. All participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing character strengths and well-being (e.g., satisfaction with life). Results: Results showed that the three groups of exemplars differed meaningfully in their character strengths and well-being from the matched comparison groups. Compared with matched counterparts, moral exemplars scored higher on the strengths related to the virtues of courage, humanity, and justice as well as the character strength of humility, creative exemplars scored higher on the character strengths of creativity and honesty, and religious exemplars scored higher on gratitude and spirituality. Conclusion: Overall, our findings suggest that character strengths are a useful framework for studying exemplary behavior.
Building Academic Honesty in Scientific Writing

Rita Erlinda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/5wv9x

2019-07-17

Abstract:The character has become a central aspect of education. It has given much more influence on the success of education in the nation. The term character is defined as an individual’s set of psychological characteristics that affect a person’s ability and inclination to function morally. It is comprised of those characteristics that lead a person to do or not to do the right thing. Numerous character values in education have been discussed and proposed by experts. One of them is honesty which significantly affects learners’ attitudes and behavior to do an act properly. Building a character of honesty in language learning can be done in many ways. One of them is through scientific writing. Writing is not only about “what” and: how” to write. Further, it deals with academic honesty which requires students to behave following character values. At this point, the issue of plagiarism should come into attention to build students’ characters. This paper aims to discuss how scientific writing promotes character building, especially in language learning.
Virtues and vocation: An historical perspective on scientific integrity in the twenty-first century

Bert Theunissen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2024.100915

IF: 0.6

Endeavour

Abstract:According to the Dutch chemist Gerrit Jan Mulder (1802-1880), the principal aim of university education was character building and moral edification. Professional training was of secondary importance. Mulder's ideas about the vocation and moral mission of the university professor can serve as a historical counterpart to later Weberian, Mertonian, and contemporary ideas on the ethos of science. I argue that a revaluation of the moral precepts that Mulder saw as defining the life of an academic is helpful in dealing with the problems of late modern science, such as the replication crisis and research misconduct. Addressing such problems must start in the university classrooms. To empower students to internalize the principles of responsible conduct of research, we need an updated version of Mulder's idea of the university professor as a moral agent.
Character Education for the 21st Century: What Should Students Learn? (I)

Bialik Maya,Bogan Michael,Fadel Charles,Horvathova Michaela,Lunju CHEN,Qunli SHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-0069.2018.05.016

2018-01-01

Abstract:The six top character qualities are mindfulness,curiosity,courage,resilience,ethics and leadership.Character education is about the acquisition and strengthening of virtues (qualities),values (ideals and concepts),and the capacity to make wise choices for a well-rounded life and a thriving society.CCR calls for Character Education of the entire population as a critical right and necessity. While knowledge and skills may or may not be used in future jobs,character qualities will invari-ably be applicable to a wide range of professions.Developing necessary character qualities,students are intended to increasingly improve self-acceptance,self-management skills,and self-understanding,actively paying attention to knowledge gap,bravely adapt oneself and overcome fears in face of challenges in various situations,autonomously make ethical decisions,and develop certain leadership by engaging in group processes.Character education greatly facilitates the realization of wisdom that is considered as ultimate goal of education by CCR.
Über wissenschaftliche Exzellenz und Wettbewerb

Gerald Schweiger

2023-10-18

Abstract:The pursuit of excellence seems to be the True North of academia. What is meant by excellence? Can excellence be measured? This article discusses the concept of excellence in the context of research and competition.

General Economics
When I use a word . . . Academic norms, a scientific ethic, and the scientific conscience

Jeffrey K Aronson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2419

2024-11-02

BMJ

Abstract:Academic normsIn order to understand the sources and nature of academic violations, one first has to understand the nature of academic norms.Starting in the 1930s the American sociologist Robert K Merton (1910–2003) described what he considered to be the norms of academic scientific practice, notably in a series of three essays,123 subsequently collected under the general heading "The Normative Structure of Science.4PuritanismIn the first of these three essays, "Motive forces of the new science,"1 later named "The Puritan spur to science,"4 Merton discussed the role of 17th century Puritanism in the development of experimental science. He linked the Protestant work ethic and the Puritan desire to further social welfare with, as Robert Boyle put it in his last will and testament, "Attempts to discover the true Nature of the Works of God ... to the Glory of the Great Author of Nature, and to the Comfort of Mankind." To this...

medicine, general & internal
Relationships between Positive Character Traits, Virtues, and Health

Dong Yoon,Patricia Bruininks,Erin Smith,Charlotte Witvliet,Daniel Cohen,Laird Edman,Joseph Bankard,Katherine Little,Brick Johnstone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34043/swc.v49i2.188

2022-08-29

Social Work & Christianity

Abstract:Virtues and character traits are increasingly recognized as impacting health outcomes, although distinctions between these constructs remain unclear. In order for Christian social workers to most effectively incorporate virtues-based interventions into their clinical practices, there is a need to identify the distinct nature of the different virtues and their relationships to health outcomes. In Part I, a principal components factor analysis of six character traits (i.e., altruism, empathy, forgiveness, gratitude, hope, and humility) based on 402 students primarily from Christian universities determined the empirical validity of these constructs (i.e., whether they are best conceptualized as distinct constructs, dimensions of higher order constructs, or one overall “goodness” virtue). Results identified 12 distinct character traits, suggesting a need to focus on specific character traits rather than general virtues. In Part II, hierarchical regressions indicated that personality variables predicted 37% of variance in mental health, with only gratitude and lack of resentment toward others (i.e., two of the 12 identified character traits) predicting an additional 8% of the variance (no variables predicted physical health). The results suggest the need to conceptualize character traits as distinct constructs, and that interventions to increase gratitude and reduce resentment may be most effective in improving mental health outcomes in Christian college students.
Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics

Susan T Fiske,Cydney Dupree

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317505111

2014-09-16

Abstract:Expertise is a prerequisite for communicator credibility, entailing the knowledge and ability to be accurate. Trust also is essential to communicator credibility. Audiences view trustworthiness as the motivation to be truthful. Identifying whom to trust follows systematic principles. People decide quickly another's apparent intent: Who is friend or foe, on their side or not, or a cooperator or competitor. Those seemingly on their side are deemed warm (friendly, trustworthy). People then decide whether the other is competent to enact those intents. Perception of scientists, like other social perceptions, involves inferring both their apparent intent (warmth) and capability (competence). To illustrate, we polled adults online about typical American jobs, rated as American society views them, on warmth and competence dimensions, as well as relevant emotions. Ambivalently perceived high-competence but low-warmth, "envied" professions included lawyers, chief executive officers, engineers, accountants, scientists, and researchers. Being seen as competent but cold might not seem problematic until one recalls that communicator credibility requires not just status and expertise but also trustworthiness (warmth). Other research indicates the risk from being enviable. Turning to a case study of scientific communication, another online sample of adults described public attitudes toward climate scientists specifically. Although distrust is low, the apparent motive to gain research money is distrusted. The literature on climate science communicators agrees that the public trusts impartiality, not persuasive agendas. Overall, communicator credibility needs to address both expertise and trustworthiness. Scientists have earned audiences' respect, but not necessarily their trust. Discussing, teaching, and sharing information can earn trust to show scientists' trustworthy intentions.
Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement

Joao Fabiano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2021.1896598

2021-04-02

AJOB Neuroscience

Abstract:<span>Our present moral traits are unable to provide the level of large-scale co-operation necessary to deal with risks such as nuclear proliferation, drastic climate change and pandemics. In order to survive in an environment with powerful and easily available technologies, some authors claim that we need to improve our moral traits with moral enhancement. But this is prone to produce paradoxical effects, be self-reinforcing and harm personal identity. The risks of moral enhancement require the use of a safety framework; such a framework should guarantee practical robustness to moral uncertainty, empirical adequacy, correct balance between dispositions, preservation of identity, and be sensitive to practical considerations such as emergent social effects. A virtue theory can meet all these desiderata. Possible frameworks incorporate them to variable degrees. The social value orientations framework is one of the most promising candidates.</span>

English Else
Individual differences in scientists' aesthetic disposition, aesthetic experiences, and aesthetic sensitivity in scientific work

Christopher Jacobi,Peter J. Varga,Zohaib Jessani,Brandon Vaidyanathan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197870

IF: 3.8

2024-01-08

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Introduction: The role of personality in shaping engagement with aesthetics in science has been almost entirely unexplored. Whereas artists and arts settings (e.g., museums) are well-studied from a psychological perspective, the practice of science has often been seen as purely rational or dry. In response, this study presents novel findings on the critical role of scientists' individual differences, which shape their engagement with aesthetics, such as the frequency of their experiences of beauty, wonder, and awe in their scientific work. Methods: Based on a very large and representative four-country study of scientists in the fields of biology and physics ( N = 3,092), this study analyzed the associations of Big Five personality traits among scientists with (i) dispositional aesthetics (DPES-awe), (ii) the frequency of aesthetic experiences in scientific work, and (iii) aesthetic sensitivity in science. These survey-weighted OLS regression models included extensive statistical controls for sociodemographic factors. Results: As hypothesized, openness is positively, and neuroticism is negatively linked with dispositional aesthetics, the frequency of aesthetic experiences in scientific work, and aesthetic sensitivity in science. Unexpectedly, agreeableness and conscientiousness (but not extraversion) are highly significant and strong predictors of the three trait and state aesthetic engagement variables. Discussion: The aesthetic engagement and personality framework of this paper is empirically supported and demonstrates the importance of personality types of scientists in the practice of science. The unexpectedly strong association of agreeableness with aesthetic engagement points to the importance of cooperation, collaboration, and communication to maximize scientific creativity.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Impact Vitality - A Measure for Excellent Scientists

Nadine Rons,Lucy Amez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.6770

2013-07-25

Digital Libraries

Abstract:In many countries and at European level, research policy increasingly focuses on 'excellent' researchers. The concept of excellence however is complex and multidimensional. For individual scholars it involves talents for innovative knowledge creation and successful transmission to peers, as well as management capacities. Excellence is also a comparative concept, implying the ability to surpass others [TIJSSEN, 2003]. Grants are in general awarded based on assessments by expert committees. While peer review is a widely accepted practice, it nevertheless is also subject to criticism. At higher aggregation levels, peer assessments are often supported by quantitative measures. At individual level, most of these measures are much less appropriate and there is a need for new, dedicated indicators.
Virtues in action - the new look of character traits

Wiebke Bleidorn,Jaap J A Denissen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12117

Abstract:The present study aimed to take fresh look at the nature and psychological meaning of consistency in character traits and virtuous behaviour as manifested in everyday life. To this end, a 10-day experience-sampling study was conducted. Using smartphone technology, a sample of 83 working mothers and fathers provided a total of 4,342 momentary behavioural reports while being in the role of the parent versus being in the job role. Consistent with recent research on personality traits, the findings of the present study showed that people express a wide range of virtue states in their everyday lives. Within-person changes in virtue states were not random but were contingent on people's current role context and also meaningfully related to their momentary affective experiences. At the same time, people's average level of virtue states, their degree of variation in virtue states, and their signature ways of reacting to role contexts turned out to be stable, trait-like individual difference characteristics. Discussion focuses on the implications for the conception of character traits in scientific psychology and beyond.
Lost in Translation: The Construct Representation of Character Virtues

Vincent Ng,Louis Tay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619886014

2020-01-23

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract:A seemingly universal lesson is that anything taken to its extreme is detrimental. Indeed, there has been growing interest in testing this idea within psychology. These studies have often been framed in terms of Aristotle’s doctrine of the golden mean or the idea that virtue lies between the vices of deficiency and excess. Recent explicit reviews of this hypothesis in the psychological literature have led to the paradoxical conclusion that one can have too much virtue (i.e., the too-much-of-a-good-thing effect) despite virtue being identified by the golden mean. We argue in this article that this conclusion is due to a reductionist account of virtues in psychology and the resultant measurement of virtues as general dispositional tendencies in behavior. We review philosophical theory on the golden mean to show that the relationship between virtue and relevant behavior is fundamentally about situation-specific optimality. Using schematic models, we contrast the former measurement approach against the latter to explain the too-much-of-a-good-thing effect and further demonstrate why virtues cannot be properly measured as general tendencies in behavior. We conclude with methodological implications of our theory-informed approach to virtue measurement for research design, evaluation, and conceptualization.

psychology, multidisciplinary
What is "Science for Science's Sake": A Typology Study of the Idea of Pure Science

WENQIN SHEN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2007.01.007

2007-01-01

Abstract:The idea of pure science originates in ancient Greece and the Age of enlightenment in Germany.Based on the idea in these two ages,we can distinguish its meanings into three kinds.Firstly,this idea holds that knowledge is an end in itself.Secondly,pure knowl-edge is rational knowledge;it has its own special logic that is beyond economic and politi-cal judgment.Thirdly,pure science or science for science's sake is an academic ethic;it emphasizes the non-utility in science inquiry.
Finding the truth in science

Elisabeth M. Bik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00702-w

IF: 78.5

2024-05-17

Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract:In a 'publish or perish' culture, some scientists may resort to questionable research practices or even fraud. Scientific paper mills and artificial intelligence increasingly threaten the pursuit of truth in science. Structural changes, including heightened scrutiny of papers and authorship and better funding, are needed to ensure scientific integrity.

oncology
Virtue is Knowledge: Methods to Promote National Moral Character (4)

WANG Haiming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-9506.2010.10.001

2010-01-01

Abstract:Freedom of thought is a means to increase the moral knowledge and the primary means to uplift a nation's moral character.In a country where freedom of thought and speech and liberty of the press are advanced,the country's science,education and culture will advance,which will raise the general knowledge level of its people including their moral knowledge,which will in its turn generate noble virtues in them.
A tripartite taxonomy of character strengths & virtues: toward professional identity formation in medical students & physicians

Stephen G. Post,Maria A. Basile,Richard J. Iuli,Phyllis Migdal,Jeffrey S. Trilling,Andrew Wackett,Lisa Strano-Paul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06169-5

IF: 3.263

2024-10-27

BMC Medical Education

Abstract:There are limited comprehensive descriptions of character strengths and virtues specific to the professional identity formation of medical students in the literature. This absence of a satisfactory summation of virtues has stimulated us to attempt a conceptual framework utilizing a tripartite taxonomy. This taxonomy reflects recent interest in and importance of justice and care of the self.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
Virtues in action are related to the integration of both temperament and character: Comparing the VIA classification of virtues and Cloninger’s biopsychosocial model of personality

Paulo A.S. Moreira,Richard A. Inman,C. Robert Cloninger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1975158

2021-09-13

The Journal of Positive Psychology

Abstract:Evidence supports three principal virtues of Self-Control, Caring, and Inquisitiveness that represent socially-construed notions of desirable behaviors. In Study 1 (n = 509 adults), we demonstrate that the three-virtue structure identified in the VIA-IS also emerges in the VIA-72. In Study 2 (n = 659 adults) we examine the relationship between virtues and personality using correlations and person-centered analyses. Cloninger's character dimensions, which capture the sociocognitive component of personality – Self-Directedness, Cooperativeness, Self-Transcendence – showed moderate overlap with the three virtues, but remained distinct in its silent and subjective transpersonal aspects that were excluded from VIA. People with positive development of all three character traits were the most virtuous. The specific virtues of a person depended on integrated profiles of both temperament and character. We conclude that virtues are expressed when habits are persistently regulated by all three character traits to the extent that they express self-transcendent goals and values.

psychology, multidisciplinary
The (im-)moral scientist? Measurement and framing effects shape the association between scientists and immorality

Bastiaan T Rutjens,Esther Niehoff,Steven J Heine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274379

IF: 3.7

2022-10-03

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Recent years have not only seen growing public distrust in science, but also in the people conducting science. Yet, attitudes toward scientists remain largely unexplored, and the limited body of literature that exists points to an interesting ambivalence. While survey data suggest scientists to be positively evaluated (e.g., respected and trusted), research has found scientists to be perceived as capable of immoral behavior. We report two experiments aimed at identifying what contributes to this ambivalence through systematic investigations of stereotypical perceptions of scientists. In these studies, we particularly focus on two potential sources of inconsistencies in previous work: divergent operationalizations of morality (measurement effects), and different specifications of the broad group of scientists (framing effects). Results show that scientists are generally perceived as more likely to violate binding as opposed to individualizing moral foundations, and that they deviate from control groups more strongly on the latter. The extent to which different morality measures reflect the differentiation between binding and individualizing moral foundations at least partially accounts for previous contradictory findings. Moreover, the results indicate large variation in perceptions of different types of scientists: people hold more positive attitudes toward university-affiliated scientists as compared to industry-affiliated scientists, with perceptions of the 'typical scientist' more closely resembling the latter. Taken together, the findings have important academic ramifications for science skepticism, morality, and stereotyping research as well as valuable practical implications for successful science communication.

Character traits: Scientific virtue

Character Strengths: the Psychological Capital to Build a Good Life

Paragons of character-Character strengths and well-being of moral, creative, and religious exemplars

Building Academic Honesty in Scientific Writing

Virtues and vocation: An historical perspective on scientific integrity in the twenty-first century

Character Education for the 21st Century: What Should Students Learn? (I)

Über wissenschaftliche Exzellenz und Wettbewerb

When I use a word . . . Academic norms, a scientific ethic, and the scientific conscience

Relationships between Positive Character Traits, Virtues, and Health

Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics

Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement

Individual differences in scientists' aesthetic disposition, aesthetic experiences, and aesthetic sensitivity in scientific work

Impact Vitality - A Measure for Excellent Scientists

Virtues in action - the new look of character traits

Lost in Translation: The Construct Representation of Character Virtues

What is "Science for Science's Sake": A Typology Study of the Idea of Pure Science

Finding the truth in science

Virtue is Knowledge: Methods to Promote National Moral Character (4)

A tripartite taxonomy of character strengths & virtues: toward professional identity formation in medical students & physicians

Virtues in action are related to the integration of both temperament and character: Comparing the VIA classification of virtues and Cloninger’s biopsychosocial model of personality

The (im-)moral scientist? Measurement and framing effects shape the association between scientists and immorality