Abstract:As one of the most popular computational approaches in modern structure-based drug design, molecular docking can be used not only to identify the correct conformation of a ligand within the target binding pocket but also to estimate the strength of the interaction between a target and a ligand. Nowadays, as a variety of docking programs are available for the scientific community, a comprehensive understanding of the advantages and limitations of each docking program is fundamentally important to conduct more reasonable docking studies and docking-based virtual screening. In the present study, based on an extensive dataset of 2002 protein-ligand complexes from the PDBbind database (version 2014), the performance of ten docking programs, including five commercial programs (LigandFit, Glide, GOLD, MOE Dock, and Surflex-Dock) and five academic programs (AutoDock, AutoDock Vina, LeDock, rDock, and UCSF DOCK), was systematically evaluated by examining the accuracies of binding pose prediction (sampling power) and binding affinity estimation (scoring power). Our results showed that GOLD and LeDock had the best sampling power (GOLD: 59.8% accuracy for the top scored poses; LeDock: 80.8% accuracy for the best poses) and AutoDock Vina had the best scoring power (r(p)/r(s) of 0.564/0.580 and 0.569/0.584 for the top scored poses and best poses), suggesting that the commercial programs did not show the expected better performance than the academic ones. Overall, the ligand binding poses could be identified in most cases by the evaluated docking programs but the ranks of the binding affinities for the entire dataset could not be well predicted by most docking programs. However, for some types of protein families, relatively high linear correlations between docking scores and experimental binding affinities could be achieved. To our knowledge, this study has been the most extensive evaluation of popular molecular docking programs in the last five years. It is expected that our work can offer useful information for the successful application of these docking tools to different requirements and targets.

Computational protein–ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite

The AutoDock suite at 30

Use of molecular docking computational tools in drug discovery

Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina

Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.

Improving Protein-Ligand Docking Results with High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Dockey: a modern integrated tool for large-scale molecular docking and virtual screening

AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility

Docking Challenge: Protein Sampling and Molecular Docking Performance

Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Protein-Ligand Interactions by Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation: A Case of Oligopeptide Binding Protein

Key Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design

Molecular docking as a popular tool in drug design, an in silico travel

Parallel multi-swarm cooperative particle swarm optimization for protein–ligand docking and virtual screening

On Evaluating Molecular-Docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors

The Art and Science of Molecular Docking

FitDock: protein–ligand docking by template fitting

Software for molecular docking: a review

An accurate and universal protein-small molecule batch docking solution using Autodock Vina

A Practical Guide to Molecular Docking and Homology Modelling for Medicinal Chemists

Setting up a large set of protein-ligand PDB complexes for the development and validation of knowledge-based docking algorithms

Molecular Docking using different Tools