Abstract:Automated docking of drug-like molecules into receptors is an essential tool in structure-based drug design. While modeling receptor flexibility is important for correctly predicting ligand binding, it still remains challenging. This work focuses on an approach in which receptor flexibility is modeled by explicitly specifying a set of receptor side-chains a-priori. The challenges of this approach include the: 1) exponential growth of the search space, demanding more efficient search methods; and 2) increased number of false positives, calling for scoring functions tailored for flexible receptor docking. We present AutoDockFR-AutoDock for Flexible Receptors (ADFR), a new docking engine based on the AutoDock4 scoring function, which addresses the aforementioned challenges with a new Genetic Algorithm (GA) and customized scoring function. We validate ADFR using the Astex Diverse Set, demonstrating an increase in efficiency and reliability of its GA over the one implemented in AutoDock4. We demonstrate greatly increased success rates when cross-docking ligands into apo receptors that require side-chain conformational changes for ligand binding. These cross-docking experiments are based on two datasets: 1) SEQ17 -a receptor diversity set containing 17 pairs of apo-holo structures; and 2) CDK2 -a ligand diversity set composed of one CDK2 apo structure and 52 known bound inhibitors. We show that, when cross-docking ligands into the apo conformation of the receptors with up to 14 flexible side-chains, ADFR reports more correctly cross-docked ligands than AutoDock Vina on both datasets with solutions found for 70.6% vs. 35.3% systems on SEQ17, and 76.9% vs. 61.5% on CDK2. ADFR also outperforms AutoDock Vina in number of top ranking solutions on both datasets. Furthermore, we show that correctly docked CDK2 complexes re-create on average 79.8% of all pairwise atomic interactions between the ligand and moving receptor atoms in the holo complexes. Finally, we show that down-weighting the receptor internal energy improves the ranking of correctly docked poses and that runtime for AutoDockFR scales linearly when side-chain flexibility is added.

AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility

The AutoDock suite at 30

AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility

AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings

DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance

Attracting Cavities 2.0: Improving the Flexibility and Robustness for Small-Molecule Docking

DockOpt: A Tool for Automatic Optimization of Docking Models

Computational protein–ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite

AMDock: a versatile graphical tool for assisting molecular docking with Autodock Vina and Autodock4

Protein flexibility upon ligand binding: Docking predictions and statistical analysis

DSDPFlex: Flexible-Receptor Docking with GPU Acceleration.

Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search

The latest automated docking technologies for novel drug discovery

AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading

The wins and failures of current docking methods tested on the flexible active site of cytochromes P450

DSDPFlex: An Improved Flexible-Receptor Docking Method with GPU Acceleration

S4MPLE—Sampler for Multiple Protein-Ligand Entities: Methodology and Rigid-Site Docking Benchmarking

Docking Challenge: Protein Sampling and Molecular Docking Performance

SOFTDOCK application to protein-protein interaction benchmark and CAPRI.

Autodock Vina Adopts More Accurate Binding Poses but Autodock4 Forms Better Binding Affinity

Evaluation of the Performance of Four Molecular Docking Programs on A Diverse Set of Protein-Ligand Complexes