Abstract:ABSTRACT Introduction Early appropriate allocation of resources for critically injured combat casualties is essential. This is especially important when inundated with an overwhelming number of casualties where limited resources must be efficiently allocated, such as during mass casualty events. There are multiple scoring systems utilized in the prehospital combat setting, including the shock index (SI), modified shock index (MSI), simple triage and rapid treatment (START), revised trauma score (RTS), new trauma score (NTS), Glasgow Coma Scale + age + pressure (GAP), and the mechanism + GAP (MGAP) score. The optimal score for application to the combat trauma population remains unclear. Materials and Methods This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry from January 1, 2007 through March 17, 2020. We constructed univariable analyses to determine the area under the receiving operator characteristic (AUROC) for the scoring systems of interest. Our primary outcomes were early death (within 24 hours) or early massive transfusion, as defined by ≥3 units. Results There were 12,268 casualties that met inclusion criteria. There were 168 (1%) who died within the first 24 hours and 2082 (17%) that underwent significant transfusion within the first 24 hours. When assessing the predictive capabilities for death within 24 hours, the AUROCs were 0.72 (SI), 0.69 (MSI), 0.89 (START), 0.90 (RTS), 0.83 (NTS), 0.90 (GAP), and 0.91 (MGAP). The AUROCs for massive transfusion were 0.89 (SI), 0.89 (MSI), 0.82 (START), 0.81 (RTS), 0.83 (NTS), 0.85 (MGAP), and 0.86 (GAP). Conclusions This study retrospectively applied seven triage tools to a database of 12,268 cases from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry to evaluate their performance in predicting early death or massive transfusion in combat. All scoring systems performed well with an AUROC >0.8 for both outcomes. Although the SI and MSI performed best for predicting massive transfusion (both had an AUROC of 0.89), they ranked last for assessment of mortality within 24 hours, with the other tools performing well. START, RTS, NTS, MGAP and GAP reliably identified early death and need for massive transfusion, with MGAP and GAP performing the best overall. These findings highlight the importance of assessing triage tools to best manage resources and ultimately preserve lives of traumatically wounded warfighters. Further studies are needed to explain the surprising performance discrepancy of the SI and MSI in predicting early death and massive transfusion.

Scoring severity in trauma: comparison of prehospital scoring systems in trauma ICU patients

Value of Trauma and Injury Severity Score in Predicting Mortality of Trauma Patients in Different Rank Hospitals

Application of trauma assessing method to a emergency triage

Comparison of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in Multiple Trauma Patients

New Injury Severity Score (NISS) Outperforms Injury Severity Score (ISS) in the Evaluation of Severe Blunt Trauma Patients

Predictive Value of Qsofa Score for Death in Emergency Department Resuscitation Room among Adult Trauma Patients:A Retrospective Study

Comparison of Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for Mortality Prediction in Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Center

Use of Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Simplified Motor Score in a Five-Level Triage System: Identifying Trauma in Adult Patients at a High Risk of Mortality

[<<RETRATO>> (REgistro de TRAuma grave de la provincia de TOledo): general view and mortality]

Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients: a multicenter study

Using the GAP score as a complement to the NISS score in identifying severely injured patients- A registry-based cohort study of adult trauma patients in Sweden

Association of the Revised Trauma Score with Mortality and Prehospital LSI Among Trauma and Non-Trauma Patients

Prognostic value of metabolic parameters measured by first responders attending patients with severe trauma: associations with the New Injury Severity Score and mortality

An Assessment of Clinical Accuracy of Vital Sign–based Triage Tools Among U.S. and Coalition Forces

Prehospital parameters can help to predict coagulopathy and massive transfusion in trauma patients

Predictive value of the Trauma Rating Index in Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Respiratory rate and Systolic blood pressure score (TRIAGES) for the short-term mortality of older patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study

Evaluation of emergency department admissions of mass casualty patients using the revised trauma score, injury severity score, and trauma and injury severity score

Prognostic value of trauma scores in pediatric patients with multiple injuries

Prehospital Shock Index Multiplied by the Alert/Verbal/Painful/Unresponsive Score as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Traumatic Injury

A comparative analysis of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting high-value care outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury

A novel fuzzy-logic inference system for predicting trauma-related mortality: emphasis on the impact of response to resuscitation