Abstract:Background and aim A variety of scoring systems are employed in intensive care units (ICUs) with the objective of predicting patient morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to compare four different severity assessment scoring systems, namely, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (SAPS II) to predict prognosis of all patients admitted to a mixed medical ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in central India. Methods The prospective observational study included 1136 patients aged 18 years or more, admitted to the mixed medical ICU. All patients underwent severity assessment using the four scoring systems, namely APACHE II, SOFA, REMS, and SAPS II, after admission. Predicted mortality was calculated from each of the scores and actual patient outcomes were noted. Receiver operating curve analysis was undertaken to identify the cut-off value of individual scoring systems for predicting mortality with optimum sensitivity and specificity. Calibration and discrimination were employed to ascertain the validity of each scoring model. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses among the study participants were conducted to identify the best scoring system, after adjusting for potential confounders. Results Final analysis was done on 957 study participants (mean (±SD) age-58.4 (±12.9) years; males-62.2%). The mortality rate was 14.7%. APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, and REMS scores were significantly higher among the non-survivors as compared to the survivors (p<0.05). SAPS II was found to have the highest AUC of 0.981 (p<0.001). SAPS II score >58 had 93.6% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, 73.3% PPV, 98.8% NPV, and 94.0% diagnostic accuracy in predicting mortality. This scoring system also had the best calibration. Binary logistic regression showed that all four scoring systems were significantly associated with ICU mortality. After adjusting for each other, only SAPS II remained significantly associated with ICU mortality. Conclusion Both SAPS II and APACHE II were observed to have good calibration and discriminatory power; however, SAPS II had the best prediction power suggesting that it may be a useful tool for clinicians and researchers in assessing the severity of illness and mortality risk in critically ill patients.

Comparison of Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for Mortality Prediction in Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Center

Value of Trauma and Injury Severity Score in Predicting Mortality of Trauma Patients in Different Rank Hospitals

New Injury Severity Score (NISS) Outperforms Injury Severity Score (ISS) in the Evaluation of Severe Blunt Trauma Patients

Comparison of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in Multiple Trauma Patients

Comparing NEWS2, TRISS, and RTS in predicting mortality rate in trauma patients based on prehospital data set: a diagnostic study

Application of trauma assessing method to a emergency triage

Evaluation of the Revised Trauma Score in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients

Use of Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Simplified Motor Score in a Five-Level Triage System: Identifying Trauma in Adult Patients at a High Risk of Mortality

Evaluation of emergency department admissions of mass casualty patients using the revised trauma score, injury severity score, and trauma and injury severity score

A Traumatic Injury Mortality Prediction (TRIMP) Based on a Comprehensive Assessment of Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 Predot Codes.

Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients: a multicenter study

Scoring severity in trauma: comparison of prehospital scoring systems in trauma ICU patients

Association of the Revised Trauma Score with Mortality and Prehospital LSI Among Trauma and Non-Trauma Patients

Predicting Mortality in Trauma Research: Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Scoring Tools in a South African Population

Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India

The incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing and comparison of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients

Comparison of Trauma and Injury Severity Score model with alternative approach in outcome prediction in trauma using National Trauma Database in Malaysia

Comparison of GAP, R-GAP, and new trauma score (NTS) systems in predicting mortality of traffic accidents that injure hospitals at Mashhad University of medical sciences

Early Mortality Risk in Acute Trauma Patients: Predictive Value of Injury Severity Score, Trauma Index, and Different Types of Shock Indices

A comparative analysis of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting high-value care outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury

Comparison of Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in the Evaluation of Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study