Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. Several validated adult autism symptom screening tools exist; however, there are concerns about the validity of instruments in adults who self-identify and those who have an autism diagnosis. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the RAADS-R and RAADS-14 across gender, autism diagnosis and autistic identity, and age among a sample of 839 adults. Participants included individuals who reported a prior diagnosis of autism, self-identified as autistic without a diagnosis, were exploring a diagnosis of autism, or neurotypical. Psychometric evaluation included confirmation of scale factor structure, and examination of item performance, including bias and discrimination, across the target sociodemographic characteristics. The RAADS-R and RAADS-14 were found to be psychometrically sound, unidimensional instruments in the present sample without systematic bias by age, diagnosis/identity, or gender. The use of dichotomous response options would improve measure parsimony. Close examination of extant item-level bias is also recommended in the development of new measures. Notably, few psychometric differences between diagnosed and self-identifying individuals were identified. There was a distinction, however, between diagnosed individuals and those exploring autistic identification. Four items representing the consequences of adverse sensory experiences and the hidden rulebook of social interaction were most informative for differentiating autistic individuals from neurotypical.Lay abstractSurveys used to screen for autism are being used much more by adults. Adults and clinicians want to be confident that the results from their surveys are accurate. If scores are not accurate, it is not possible to compare the scores of different groups of individuals. There are also concerns that these surveys do not accurately identify autistic individuals. This study explored the accuracy of two commonly used autism screening surveys for adults: the RAADS-R and the RAADS-14. The accuracy of these two screening tools was measured using a sample of 839 adults. Adults in the study were in one of the following categories: (1) diagnosed with autism, (2) adults who considered themselves to be autistic but had not been diagnosed, (3) adults who were unsure whether they were autistic, and (4) adults who did not consider themselves to be autistic and had not been diagnosed. The study found that the RAADS-R and the RAADS-14 are accurate. The study also found that a person's age, gender, autism diagnosis, or whether an individual considered themselves to be autistic did not impact how they understood the survey. Survey accuracy could be improved by changing the number of question responses from four to two. Importantly, individuals with a clinical diagnosis of autism and those who considered themselves to be autistic responded to survey items in a very similar way. Individuals with autism diagnoses and those who were unsure whether they were autistic were more different in their responses. Four specific survey items related to sensory experiences and social interaction identified key differences between autistic and non-autistic adults.

Feasibility Assessment of a Health Preference Study in Autism Based on the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS2): A Qualitative Study with Clinicians and Caregivers

Assessing autism with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)

Different autism measures targeting different severity levels in children with autism spectrum disorder

The Relationship Between the Childhood Autism Rating Scale: Second Edition and Clinical Diagnosis Utilizing the DSM-IV-TR and the DSM-5

Evaluating the impact of needs assessment models on autistic childrens participation in the habilitation process: protocol for a prospective observational study

Feasibility and Impact of Integrating an Artificial Intelligence–Based Diagnosis Aid for Autism Into the Extension for Community Health Outcomes Autism Primary Care Model: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study

Psychometric exploration of the RAADS-R with autistic adults: Implications for research and clinical practice

Caring for a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Parents’ Quality of Life: Application of the CarerQol

A New Approach to the Measurement of Adaptive Behavior: Development of the PEDI-CAT for Children and Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Acceptability of employment readiness measures in youth and young adults on the autism spectrum: a mixed-methods study

Criterion Validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales Teacher Report

A novel screening instrument for the assessment of autism in German language: validation of the German version of the RAADS-R, the RADS-R

Perspectives from the Autism Community on the Potential Utility of a Novel Measure of Suicide Risk and Mental Health Symptoms for Autistic Youth: A Pilot Study

An evaluation of the German version of the Sensory Perception Quotient from an expert by experience perspective

Testing a cognitive behavioural therapy program for anxiety in autistic adolescents: a feasibility study

Sensory Profile-2 in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Analysis within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework

Cross-Cultural Revision and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (2–5 Years)

An Exploratory Study of a Dimensional Assessment of the Diagnostic Criteria for Autism

Development of the Signposting Questionnaire for Autism (SQ-A): measurement comparison with the 10-item Autism Spectrum Quotient-Child and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the UK and Latvia

Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey

Feasibility and acceptability of autism adapted safety plans: an external pilot randomised controlled trial