Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. Several validated adult autism symptom screening tools exist; however, there are concerns about the validity of instruments in adults who self-identify and those who have an autism diagnosis. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the RAADS-R and RAADS-14 across gender, autism diagnosis and autistic identity, and age among a sample of 839 adults. Participants included individuals who reported a prior diagnosis of autism, self-identified as autistic without a diagnosis, were exploring a diagnosis of autism, or neurotypical. Psychometric evaluation included confirmation of scale factor structure, and examination of item performance, including bias and discrimination, across the target sociodemographic characteristics. The RAADS-R and RAADS-14 were found to be psychometrically sound, unidimensional instruments in the present sample without systematic bias by age, diagnosis/identity, or gender. The use of dichotomous response options would improve measure parsimony. Close examination of extant item-level bias is also recommended in the development of new measures. Notably, few psychometric differences between diagnosed and self-identifying individuals were identified. There was a distinction, however, between diagnosed individuals and those exploring autistic identification. Four items representing the consequences of adverse sensory experiences and the hidden rulebook of social interaction were most informative for differentiating autistic individuals from neurotypical.Lay abstractSurveys used to screen for autism are being used much more by adults. Adults and clinicians want to be confident that the results from their surveys are accurate. If scores are not accurate, it is not possible to compare the scores of different groups of individuals. There are also concerns that these surveys do not accurately identify autistic individuals. This study explored the accuracy of two commonly used autism screening surveys for adults: the RAADS-R and the RAADS-14. The accuracy of these two screening tools was measured using a sample of 839 adults. Adults in the study were in one of the following categories: (1) diagnosed with autism, (2) adults who considered themselves to be autistic but had not been diagnosed, (3) adults who were unsure whether they were autistic, and (4) adults who did not consider themselves to be autistic and had not been diagnosed. The study found that the RAADS-R and the RAADS-14 are accurate. The study also found that a person's age, gender, autism diagnosis, or whether an individual considered themselves to be autistic did not impact how they understood the survey. Survey accuracy could be improved by changing the number of question responses from four to two. Importantly, individuals with a clinical diagnosis of autism and those who considered themselves to be autistic responded to survey items in a very similar way. Individuals with autism diagnoses and those who were unsure whether they were autistic were more different in their responses. Four specific survey items related to sensory experiences and social interaction identified key differences between autistic and non-autistic adults.

The Relationship Between the Childhood Autism Rating Scale: Second Edition and Clinical Diagnosis Utilizing the DSM-IV-TR and the DSM-5

Different autism measures targeting different severity levels in children with autism spectrum disorder

Assessing autism with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)

Feasibility Assessment of a Health Preference Study in Autism Based on the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS2): A Qualitative Study with Clinicians and Caregivers

Comparing Rates of Diagnosis Using DSM-IV-TR Versus DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Criterion Validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scales Teacher Report

The Relationship Development Assessment – Research Version: Preliminary validation of a clinical tool and coding schemes to measure parent-child interaction in autism

Concordance and validity between versions of the ADHD Conners scale for Parents

Comparison of ICD-10R, DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 in an Adult Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnostic Clinic

Comparing Diagnostic Outcomes of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria

Measuring Anxiety in Autistic Children: Assessing the Validity of the Anxiety Scale for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Inter-Rater Agreement on the Scale Developed for Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Early Childhood

Stability and Validity of Self-Reported Depression and Anxiety in Autistic Youth

Psychometric exploration of the RAADS-R with autistic adults: Implications for research and clinical practice

Performance of the Social Responsiveness Scale-2 for the Assessment of Autistic Behaviors in a Sample of Canadian Preschool-Aged Children

Validity and Reliability Analysis of the Chinese Parent Version of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (6–18 Years)

Caregiver and youth inter‐rater assessment agreement in autism spectrum disorder, developmental coordination disorder, and typical development

Screening and diagnostic tools for autism spectrum disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Developmental Profile of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Versus Social Communication Disorder: A Pilot Study

Predicting diagnostic outcome in adult autism spectrum disorder using the autism diagnostic observation schedule, second edition

Screening Options in Autism Telediagnosis: Examination of TAP, M-CHAT-R, and DCI Concordance and Predictive Value in a Telediagnostic Model