Abstract:Background context: Traditional anterior spinal surgery (TASS) for the thoracolumbar spine is associated with significant morbidities. To avoid excessive tissue damage, minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) has been developed to treat a variety of anterior spinal disorders at the authors' institution. No previous reports comparing the outcomes of MASS and TASS for the treatment of infectious spondylitis were noted in the literature, to our knowledge. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of MASS in managing infectious spondylitis and compare the results to TASS with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Study design: A retrospective comparative cohort study in a single center. Patient sample: Forty patients with thoracic or lumbar infectious spondylitis who underwent anterior spinal surgery were enrolled. Outcome measures: Perioperative data including operative time, estimated blood loss, packed red blood cell transfusion, postoperative tube drainage, need for intensive care, and length of hospital stay. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Fusion grade was assessed by plain radiographs on the basis of Burkus criteria. Methods: Between January 2002 and June 2010, all enrolled patients were collected via the Spine Operation Registry of the authors' institution. There were 23 MASS patients and 17 TASS patients. The average follow-up was 4.2 years (range, 2-9 years). Results: The mean estimated blood loss in MASS and TASS groups was 521.7 versus 979.4 mL (p=.007), intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells was 0.9 versus 2.7 units (p=.019), the amount of postoperative tube drainage was 235.2 versus 454.3 mL (p=.005), the number of patients requiring postoperative intensive care was 2 versus 7 (p=.023), and length of hospital stay was 15.4 versus 22.9, respectively (p=.043). The overall complication rate in the MASS group was 17% and 59% in the TASS group (p=.007). No major complications occurred in the MASS group, whereas four occurred in the TASS group (p=.026). Bone graft union was achieved in 38 of 39 survival patients (97%), with no difference between the groups. One patient in TASS had a pseudarthrosis and needed a posterior instrumented fusion. Conclusions: Minimal access spinal surgery has been suggested to be an effective and safe technique in treating thoracic and lumbar infectious spondylitis. Minimal access spinal surgery did not need endoscopic equipments or complex surgical instruments. Furthermore, in comparison to TASS, MASS resulted in a reduced blood transfusion amount, decreased intensive care unit stay, reduced overall length of stay, and reduced surgical complication rate. Nevertheless, the risks may be increased in performing MASS on patients with multilevel involvement, which could be associated with high vascularity, alternated vascular anatomy, increased soft-tissue edema, and adhesion.

Pilot study to assess the role of minimal access surgery in the management of superficial surgical infections

Ambulatory Pathway for the Management of Superficial Abscesses: Criteria for Safe Provision of Care

THE EXPERIENCE OF A DAYCARE CENTRE WITH A MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH FOR PERIANAL ABSCESSES IN ADULTS.

Minimally invasive technique in treatment of complex, subcutaneous abscesses in children

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL INCISION AND DRAINAGE VERSUS INCISION AND DRAINAGE WITH PRIMARY CLOSURE OF THE WOUND IN ACUTE ABSCESS

Purulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections, Challenging the Practice of Incision and Drainage: A Scoping Review

Incision and loop drainage: a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children

A Comparative Study of Drainage of Breast Abscesses by Conventional Incision and Drainage vs Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration/Re-Aspiration in A Tertiary Health Care Centre

Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Paradigm Shift in Surgical Procedures

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Closed Abdominal Incision- A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Comparison of minimal access and traditional anterior spinal surgery in managing infectious spondylitis: a minimum 2-year follow-up

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasonography-Guided Needle Aspiration and Surgical Drainage for the Management of Breast Abscess

Evaluation of Negative Pressure Dressings for Closed Surgical Incisions in Decreasing Surgical Site Infections After Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Improving Quality Metrics with a Day-only Skin Abscess Protocol: Experience from Australia

Comparison of surgical site infection (SSI) between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) assisted delayed primary closure and conventional delayed primary closure in grossly contaminated emergency abdominal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

The impact of minimally invasive surgical approaches on surgical-site infections

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF LOOP DRAINAGE OF SUBCUTANEOUS ABSCESS- A NEW GOLD STANDARD?

A prospective study on bacteriological profile and antibiogram of postoperative wound infections in a tertiary care hospital in Western Rajasthan

Optimizing Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Dermatologic Surgery

Loop and drain technique for subcutaneous abscess: a safe minimally invasive procedure in an adult population

The effect of damage control laparotomy on surgical-site infection risks after emergent intestinal surgery