Diagnostic Performance of McMonnies Questionnaire as a Screening Survey for Dry Eye: A Multicenter Analysis

Yuxin Guo,Rongmei Peng,Kang Feng,Jing Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6210853

2016-01-01

Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:Purpose . To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the McMonnies questionnaire as a screening survey for dry eye in Chinese outpatients. Methods . The questionnaire was self-administered by 27,999 patients with dry eye symptoms. A thorough ophthalmic examination including tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescein staining, and Schirmer I test was completed to make a clinical diagnosis of dry eye. Reliability, validity, and accuracy of the McMonnies questionnaire were assessed. Results . The McMonnies questionnaire showed poor internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.37 ), but excellent validity as the scores correlated with TBUT (Spearman test, r = - 0.322 , P < 0.001 ) and Schirmer I test (Spearman’s test, r = - 0.370 , P < 0.001 ), and significantly differed between the dry eye and control groups (2-sample t -test, t = 69.51 , P < 0.001 ). The area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.729, suggesting moderate accuracy in identifying dry eye and non-dry eye patients. However, the AUCs varied significantly in different gender and age subgroups ( z test, P < 0.001 ), as the discriminating ability declined with age. Analysis of the ROC curves also revealed that different cut-off points should be employed for each subgroup to achieve the same level of accuracy. Conclusions . The McMonnies questionnaire demonstrates moderate diagnostic value, and different cut-off points should be selected for various study populations.

ophthalmology