Relative Deprivation Theory and Political Violence in Iran

Alam Saleh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310873_6

2013-01-01

Abstract:Identity is dynamic and changeable over the course of time; “people change and adapt.”1 Barry Buzan points out that societal security as a concept is concerned with states when they are “undermined or destabilized by ‘their’ societies, becoming threatened or weakened in terms of social cohesion and identity.”2 Societal insecurity occurs when people within a certain geographically defined state assume that their identity is threatened. This perceived threat can be triggered and bolstered by a collective feeling of relative deprivation, be it social, economic, political, or cultural. The result manifests itself in societal insecurity. Mansoor Moaddel, for instance, points out that intensive economic and political insufficiency leads to insecurity within the state.3 Buzan, in an effort to define different types of societal threats, says that “societal threats come in a wide variety of forms, but there are four obvious basic types: physical threats (pain, injury, death), economic threats (seizure, or destruction of property, denial of access to work or resources), threats to rights (imprisonment, denial of normal civil liberties), and threats to position or status (demotion, public humiliation).”4 Ervand Abrahamian states that the cause of the 1979 revolution in Iran was “the interaction between political organization and social forces,”5 such as ethnic groups, youth, women, and class politics. Moaddel suggests that “Shi’a revolutionary discourse, in turn, transformed the economic difficulties and social discontents of the 1970s into a revolutionary crisis.”6