Missing Pieces: Thinking about Civil–Military Cooperation

Christopher Ankersen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003355_2
2014-01-01
Abstract:It is possible to write in a variety of styles, some of which rely on a manipulation of grammar for their effect. Take three examples. First, if a writer leaves out the active subject of a sentence, that sentence is said to be written in the ‘passive voice’ (or, as it is increasingly known, the ‘bureaucratic voice’). Things happen, but it is not clear how. The focus is on completed action and ultimate effect rather than on any actor. This style has the effect of creating an atmosphere devoid of responsibility; when a child explains ‘the window got broken’, it begs the question ‘who broke it?’ Ernest Hemingway provides a second example of a literary style; he was famous for his simplified writing, noted for its lack of adjectives and adverbs. The result is terse and abrupt prose, one where the characters’ context (the extent of their relationship, for example) is often implicit or assumed. The focus is on the character (Nick Adams, say) rather than his history. This gives the reader the strange feeling of eavesdropping on a conversation and not being quite ‘up to speed’ with what is being said. The novel Le Train de Nulle Part provides the third example: It is written entirely without verbs—description par excellence. The common critical complaint is predictable: not enough action.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?