Health and Social Services in Public Schools: Historical Perspectives.
David B. Tyack
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1602459
1992-01-21
Abstract:There is a long history in the United States of providing noneducational services to children in a school setting. Initially, as part of social reform efforts early in this century, health services were provided primarily by public health doctors and dentists who volunteered their services. Groups such as philanthropic women's clubs provided breakfasts or lunches, vacation schools, and playgrounds. In urban slums, settlement houses pioneered new forms of school-linked social work and vocational guidance. A primary goal of the earliest efforts to provide health and social services at schools was to help immigrant children cope with poverty and assimilate into the dominant culture. As health and social services became embedded in the schools, the services became more school-centered and less family-oriented, focusing on improving school attendance, for instance. The number of noneducational staff and the ratio of these staff to pupils has increased markedly in the past 40 years. Some communities, however-primarily the poorer ones--have often suffered cutbacks in such staff during budget crises. As in the past, the ultimate goal of today's renewed efforts to provide school-linked health and social services is to make students productive members of society. Current reform proposals build either on a "nation-at-risk" model, with the goal of improved academic performance and international competitiveness, or a "children-at-risk" model, with the goal of meeting the health and social needs of currently underserved children. The author contends that urban school reform should be based on the second model, incorporating lessons from the past. he time has come for a new conception of the responsibilities of the school," the reformer writes. The lives of youth in cities are desperate, parents "bring up their children in surroundings which make them in large numbers vicious and criminally dangerous," and some agency must take charge of "the entire problem of child life and master it." It is clear who should do so: "If the school does not assume this responsibility, how shall the work be done?"I An urban superintendent agrees: The school should "serve as a clearinghouse for children's activities so that all child welfare agencies may be working simultaneously and efficiently, thus creating a child world within the city wherein all children may have a wholesome environment all of the day and every day. "2 A sociologist echoes this idea: All agencies dealing with "neglected or behavior-problem children" should "be closely David Tyack, Ph.D., is the Vida Jacks professor of education and a professor of history at Stanford University. This content downloaded from 157.55.39.215 on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:10:57 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 20 THE FUTURE OF CHILDREN SPRING 1992 "Night School in the West Side Lodging-House, "circa 1891, New York City. The house was run for homeless, working boys by The Children's Aid Society. (From The Children of the Poor, by Jacob A. Riis, 1892.)
History,Medicine,Education