Abstract:BACKGROUND:The equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on creatinine have been found to have limitations and have not been generalizable across all populations. Equations based on cystatin C provide an alternative method to estimate GFR. Whether the equation based on cystatin C alone or combined creatinine would improve GFR estimates has not been validated among Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation based on creatinine with the five cystatin C-based formulae for estimation of GFR in patients with CKD and diabetes.METHODS:A total of 166 patients with CKD and 91 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this study. Cystatin C was measured by using the particle-enhanced immunonephelometric method and estimated formulae proposed by five different investigator teams (Stevens, Ma, Rule, Macisaac and Perkins). The plasma clearance of (99m)Tc-DTPA was determined as measured GFR (mGFR).RESULTS:For CKD patients, the bias and accuracy for the Ma and Macisaac equations were superior compared with the MDRD, and the mean results for the Ma formula were closer to mGFR than the other equations in CKD stages 2 - 5. The differences between Macisaac and mGFR in CKD stages 2 - 4 were significantly less than those in CKD stage 1 or 5. Stevens and Rule's formulae revealed a similar bias and accuracy compared with the MDRD equation. The MDRD formula had a higher accuracy in CKD stages 3 - 5 as compared with the results in other stages. For diabetic patients, the mean results between Macisaac and mGFR were closer than those of other equations in mGFR >or= 90 mlxmin(-1)x1.73 m(-2) stage. In GFR 60 - 89 mlxmin(-1)x1.73 m(-2) stage, the MDRD formula showed the smallest difference compared with other equations. All equations overestimated GFR in the cases with GFR < 60 mlxmin(-1)x1.73 m(-2) stages. The MDRD formula had a greater accuracy within 50% of mGFR than the equations based on cystatin C in diabetic patients. Perkins formula showed a large positive bias and low accuracy, therefore it may not be suitable for assessing GFR in patients with CKD and diabetes.CONCLUSIONS:The formulae for estimating GFR based on cystatin C or creatinine have different trends and accuracies in patients with CKD and diabetes, especially in patients with various GFR levels. The equations based on cystatin C provide less accurate results than MDRD formulae, at least in the diabetic patients. Therefore, whether the formulae based on cystatin C are superior to MDRD formula requires further investigation in large diverse populations.

Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Equation Pronouncedly Underestimates Glomerular Filtration Rate in Type 2 Diabetes

Diagnostic performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation at estimating glomerular filtration rate in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Comparison of the Heart Failure Risk Stratification Performance of the CKD–EPI Equation and the MDRD Equation for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Collaboration equation for estimating glomerular fi ltration rate in the Chinese population

The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation Improves the Detection of Hyperfiltration in Chinese Diabetic Patients.

The EKFC equation outperforms the CKD‐EPI and CKiD equations for GFR estimation in adolescent and young adult kidney transplant patients

2009 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration rate estimation in Black individuals outside the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical implications of the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation compared with the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study equation for the estimation of renal dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease

Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Glomerular Filtration Rates Estimating Equations in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate compared to endogenous creatinine clearance

410-P: Evaluating the Performance of the 2021 CKD–EPI Equation in People with Diabetes

Evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for estimating the glomerular filtration rate in multiple ethnicities

Passaggio dalla formula MDRD alla CKD-EPI: impatto sulla riclassificazione in stadi della malattia renale cronica

Evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in the Chinese Population

Clinical application of the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in diabetes mellitus patients

A Validation Study on Egfr Equations in Chinese Patients with Diabetic or Non-diabetic CKD

Impact of creatinine methodology on glomerular filtration rate estimation in diabetes

Prospects for improved glomerular filtration rate estimation based on creatinine—results from a transnational multicentre study

Comparative Performance of the Equations for Estimating GFR in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Evaluation of various equations for estimating renal function in elderly Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The accuracy comparison and the clinic value of the glomerular filtration rate estimated by equations