Morphology before phonology: A case study of Turoyo (Neo-Aramaic)
Laura Kalin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3
2020-07-29
Morphology
Abstract:Some models of the morphology-phonology interface take (certain aspects of) morphology and phonology to be computed in the same component of the grammar, simultaneously, including many instantiations of Optimality Theory (McCarthy and Prince <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR53">1993a</a>,<a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR54">b</a>, Kager <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR37">1996</a>, Hyman and Inkelas <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR34">1997</a>, Mascaró <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR50">2007</a>, Wolf <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR70">2008</a>, <i>i.a.</i>). On the other hand are models that separate morphology from phonology, including Distributed Morphology (Halle and Marantz <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR25">1993</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR26">1994</a>) and related models (e.g., Trommer <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR68">2001</a>, Bye and Svenonius <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR10">2012</a>, Dawson <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR17">2017</a>, Rolle <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR63">2020</a>), as well as "subcategorization"-based approaches (Paster <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR58">2006</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR59">2009</a>, Yu <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR71">2007</a>, <i>i.a.</i>). I undertake a careful study of the order of operations needed to derive the form of finite verbs in the Neo-Aramaic language Turoyo (Jastrow <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR35">1993</a>). Two morphophonological phenomena found in Turoyo verbs provide evidence for a separation of morphology from phonology: (i) phonologically-conditioned suppletive allomorphy that is anti-optimizing and surface opaque (reaffirming the findings of Paster <a href="/article/10.1007/s11525-020-09365-3#ref-CR58">2006</a>); and (ii) phonological displacement of an affix (à la infixation) that is also anti-optimizing and surface opaque, and even more surprisingly, counterbleeds morphological operations in the verbal complex but feeds/bleeds phonological ones. The main conclusion from Turoyo is that exponent choice precedes, and is oblivious to, the regular phonology of the language and considerations of phonological optimization. Turoyo also provides a more general window into a number of issues at the morphology-phonology interface, including cyclicity, the timing of infixation, and constraints on allomorphy.