On the Asymmetry between Echo Classifiers and General Classifiers

Cheng Gong,Chi Yangqin,Yi Zhaohui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7509/j.linsci.201706.030824
2018-01-01
Abstract:There are two types of classifiers in the Sino-Tibetan languages. One is referred to as general classifiers (GCs) that can combine with different nouns; the other is called echo classifiers (ECs) that have phonetic forms identical to the relevant nouns. It is argued in the majority of existing studies that ECs are the embryonic form of classifiers, and limited in many ways. They are therefore being or will be replaced by GCs. The validity of this argument is questioned in the present study based on a case study of nominal ECs in Thai and verbal GCs in Chinese. A detailed analysis of the syntactic structures and derivational processes of the two types of classifier phrases in the present arguably shows that GCs and ECs are essentially two forms of the same syntactic structure, the only fundamental difference between them being that the former is a functional category and the latter a lexical category. The asymmetry between the two on their paths of development cannot be accounted for by simply resorting to a linear and one. way process of grammaticalization. Instead, this asymmetry is more appropriately attributed to language. internal factors. Actually, GCs and ECs are equal options licensed by Universal Grammar. The choice made by a particular language on the form of its classifiers is determined by the overall architecture of this language.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?