Abstract:Maps are essential tools for providing tourism information. Hence, it is imperative for tourism marketers to understand how tourists perceive spatial information and sense physical places virtually presented in digital maps. Based on sense of place, spatial cognition, and virtual reality literature, this study constructed a conceptual framework to measure how different interactivity levels of a digital map interface affect potential tourists' experience when exploring maps. In addition, the study explored how individual characteristics such as place attachment and spatial ability affect virtual-spatial experiences. An experiment was conducted to test the developed Virtual Spatial Experience model. Google Earth maps were manipulated using two experimental conditions: low level (satellite view map only) vs. high level (three dimensional (3D) dynamic objects). The questionnaire included self-report items regarding perceived map interactivity, spatial ability, affective place attachment, spatial orientation, spatial imagery, and spatial presence. Responses from 211 students were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The study results showed that map interfaces influence human perceptions of map interactivity. Perceived map interactivity positively affected virtual spatial experiences: spatial orientation, spatial imagery and spatial presence. Spatial ability positively influenced spatial orientation which in turn led to greater spatial imagery and ultimately greater spatial presence. The results further demonstrated that affective place attachment positively influenced spatial presence. The findings provided evidence that sense of place in the real world, such as affective place attachment to the experimental setting (Walt Disney World, Florida), influences spatial experiences of an environment virtually presented in the map. Therefore, by applying place attachment to virtual environment studies, this study expanded the scope of theories used in exploring human spatial experience. Moreover, evaluating the influence of map interactivity, this study provided practical implications for designing destination maps. By applying 3D dynamic objects as a design feature in an interactive map, tourism marketers can produce enhanced virtual spatial experiences. As this study used Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom Park presented on Google Earth as the experimental setting, the collected data also informs the understanding of virtual experiences and perceptions of the park.

Measuring the Spatial Component of Sense of Place: A Methodology for Research on the Spatial Dynamics of Psychological Experiences of Places

Measuring the Spatial Component of Sense of Place: A Methodology for Research on the Spatial Dynamics of Psychological Experiences of Places

SUBJECTIVE MAPPING METHODOLOGIES FOR INCORPORATING SPATIAL VARIATION IN RESEARCH ON SOCIAL CAPITAL AND SENSE OF PLACE

Sense of Place and Forest Science: Toward a Program of Quantitative Research

Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications

SENSE OF PLACE AS AN ATTITUDE: LAKESHORE OWNERS ATTITUDES TOWARD THEIR PROPERTIES

MEASURING SENSE OF PLACE: METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS

Sense of place in environmental education

A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties

Rethink the Ways of Behavioral Pattern Research by Using Fine-Grained Subjective and Objective Assessment Data

Spatial Hyperspheric Models for Compositional Data

Is It Really Just a Social Construction?: The Contribution of the Physical Environment to Sense of Place

Urban Sensory Map: How Do Tourists "sense" a Destination Spatially?

Sense of place evoked by interactive maps

Trouble with Sense of Place in Working Landscapes

A Field Analysis of Standardizing Place-Based Indicators.

Spatial Measurement Errors in the Field of Spatial Epidemiology

Sense of place as an indicator of community sustainability

Quantitative measurement of urban spatial vitality by integrating physical built environment and subjective perception dimensions

Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings?