Abstract:Introduction: Biodiversity underpins resilient ecosystems that sustain life. Despite international conservation efforts, biodiversity is still declining due to ongoing anthropogenic threats. Protected areas have been widely adopted as a strategy for conserving biodiversity. The use of spatial conservation planning, which prioritizes areas for protection based on geo-referenced biodiversity and ecological information as well as cost of action and their feasibility, has gained popularity in the conservation discipline in the last few decades. However, there remain gaps between plans and implementation, and negative social impacts on local communities can occur, such as tension and conflict between differing priorities, perspectives, and views. Methods: To better understand the state of the spatial conservation field and support translating research into practice, a mixed-method approach of bibliometric (n=4133 documents) and content analysis (n=2456 documents) was used to analyze and identify key research priorities, collaborative networks, and geographic and thematic patterns. Results: We identified that research conducted by westernized nations dominated the field, with the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia being responsible for almost two-thirds of the research globally, with research interest exponentially growing since 2010. Additionally, while there has been some refinement over time of algorithms and models, Zonation and Marxan methods developed in the 2000s remain the predominant choices of software, with a majority focus on marine ecosystems, birds, and mammals. We found a major gap in the use of social dimensions in spatial conservation case studies (only n=146; 6%). Discussion: This gap highlights a lack of collaboration in conservation science between researchers and local communities who are affected by management decisions. We recommend including spatially explicit social dimensions from the onset of projects through participatory approaches, along with the acknowledgement by researchers of the importance of including diverse views in conservation planning to enhance implementation and outcomes that are relevant in local contexts. We suggest an increased reflection on types of data used for conservation but also on researchers' personal values, biases, and positionality to encourage more ethical, applicable, and collaborative conservation science.

Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications

Measuring the Spatial Component of Sense of Place: A Methodology for Research on the Spatial Dynamics of Psychological Experiences of Places

Specifying geospatial data product characteristics for forest and fuel management applications

SUBJECTIVE MAPPING METHODOLOGIES FOR INCORPORATING SPATIAL VARIATION IN RESEARCH ON SOCIAL CAPITAL AND SENSE OF PLACE

Assessing Perceived Landscape Change from Opportunistic Spatiotemporal Occurrence Data

Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resource Management: Comparing Tools and Emphasizing the Importance of In-Situ Data

A Public Participation GIS for Geodiversity and Geosystem Services Mapping in a Mountain Environment: A Case from Grayson County, Virginia, U.S.A.

Interactive Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives for Landscape Conservation and Public Engagement

Using remote sensing in support of environmental management: A framework for selecting products, algorithms and methods

Identifying Environmental and Natural Resource Management Conflict Potential Using Participatory Mapping

Assessing Public Preferences of Landscape and Landscape Attributes: a Case Study of the Proposed Appalachian Geopark Project in West Virginia, USA

Geospatial technologies and digital geomorphological mapping: Concepts, issues and research

Landscape Metrics: Past Progress and Future Directions

Quantifying the visual-sensory landscape qualities that contribute to cultural ecosystem services using social media and LiDAR

Relating landscape ecological metrics with public survey data on perceived landscape quality and place attachment

Spatial scale influences how people value and perceive green open space

Mapping landscape services: a case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands

Why public health needs GIS: a methodological overview

Global trends in geospatial conservation planning: a review of priorities and missing dimensions

Big Data‐enabled Social Sensing in Spatial Analysis: Potentials and Pitfalls