The Double-Edged Sword of Underdog Expectations in Organizations in Shanghai, China: The Mediating Role of Feedback-Avoiding Behaviors and Proving Others Wrong and the Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus
Jinli Xue,Mengting Zhu,Yanan Guo,Demin Kong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S368632
IF: 3.974
2022-08-17
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Jinli Xue, 1 Mengting Zhu, 2 Yanan Guo, 3 Demin Kong 4 1 Research Center for Energy Economics, School of Business Administration, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 3 School of Financial Management, Zhejiang Financial College, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China; 4 School of Humanities, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Mengting Zhu, School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-18682641363, Email Purpose: According to the traditional view, "underdog expectations" induce self-doubt in employees, resulting in negative effects. However, a new study suggests that underdog expectations may encourage employees to work harder, resulting in positive effects. Based on regulatory focus theory, this study constructed a moderated double-mediation model to explain the "double-edged sword effect" of underdog expectations. Subjects and Methods: A three-wave survey method and leader–employee pairing method were used to conduct a questionnaire survey among 346 employees drawn from five enterprises in Shanghai, China. Statistical analysis methods, including hierarchical regression analysis, simple slope analysis, and difference analysis, were used for data analysis. SPSS 24.0, Amoss 24.0, and Mplus 7.4 software were employed to test four proposed hypotheses. Results: Under the positive moderating effect of prevention focus, underdog expectations reduce employee work engagement by adopting an avoidance path of employee feedback-avoiding behaviors( β = 0.090, p < 0.01). Moreover, underdog expectations play a negative role in this situation . Under the positive moderating effect of promotion focus, underdog expectations improve employee work engagement by adopting an approach of proving others wrong ( β = 0.189, p < 0.001). Moreover, underdog expectations play a positive role in this situation. Conclusion: The study results refined the double-sided effects of underdog expectations on employee work engagement and provided theoretical and practical implications for managers on how to motivate employees with underdog expectations and how to better convey expectations to subordinates. Keywords: underdog expectations, regulatory focus theory, prove others wrong, feedback-avoiding behaviors In any organization, only a few star employees who are considered to make great individual contributions to their organizational performance and are expected by others to succeed are valued by leaders, and it is common for some employees to be regarded as underdogs who are not recognized for their abilities by others and are always expected to fail. In many cases, ordinary employees, especially new entrants, lack an appropriate stage and opportunities to showcase their talents and potential. In the eyes of others, employees with "underdog expectations" are employees who cannot perform well at work. Underdog expectations are associated with an individual's self-image, that is, an individual has a negative self-image in the eyes of others. Consistent with this view, Northcraft and Ashford found that individuals with underdog expectations tend to avoid seeking feedback from others as much as possible, so that they avoid encountering the negative impression others hold of them. 1 Previous studies have shown that underdog expectations reduce employees' self-efficacy, leading to negative consequences, such as reduced organizational commitment, reduced work engagement, and poor leader–member exchange. 2,3 However, a study by Nurmohamed showed that some employees still demonstrate good performance in the face of underdog expectations. 4 According to the researcher, when employees perceive underdog expectations to be applied to them, they experienced a desire to prove others wrong so as to improve their task performance and demonstrate "the underdog effect (underdog expectations boost performance)". 4 Nurmohamed's study made up for the shortcomings of previous studies, which focused only on the negative aspects of underdog expectations, and focused instead on the positive aspects of underdog expectations, but still failed to clarify under what conditions underdog expectations have negative effects and when they induce positive effects. Nurmohamed's study challenged previous researchers' focus on the negative effects of underdog expectations and opened up a new perspective for exploring their positive effects. 4 Nurmohamed pointed out that previous studies assumed that underdog expectatio -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary