Failed cartilage repair for early osteoarthritis defects: a biochemical, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of the repair tissue after treatment with marrow-stimulation techniques

Gunter Kaul,Magali Cucchiarini,Klaus Remberger,Dieter Kohn,Henning Madry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1853-x
2012-01-06
Abstract:PURPOSE: To examine the entire repair tissue resulting from marrow-stimulation techniques in patients with early osteoarthritis.METHODS: The repair tissue and adjacent articular cartilage after failed marrow-stimulation techniques (microfracture and Pridie drilling) of 5 patients (47-65 years old) with cartilage defects and radiographic early osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grading 1 and 2) was removed during total joint arthroplasty (mean time until analysis: 8.8 months), analysed by histology, polarized light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, biochemistry and by histological score systems.RESULTS: Macroscopic cartilage repair assessment revealed ICRS grades of II (nearly normal) and III (abnormal). Cartilage defects were mostly completely filled with a fibrocartilaginous tissue that had small and large fissures. Cartilage-specific stains of the repair tissue were more intense than the surrounding native cartilage but reduced compared with normal articular cartilage. The subchondral bone was incompletely restored. A new tidemark was absent. The repair tissue always showed positive immunoreactivity for types II and X collagen, and was sometimes positive for type I collagen. Proteoglycan contents of the repair tissue were generally higher than of the surrounding cartilage. The repair tissue was always more cellular than the adjacent articular cartilage. Histological scoring of the repair tissue revealed a mean Sellers score of 17.6 ± 3.0 and an ICRS grading of 7-9.CONCLUSION: Failed marrow stimulation of articular cartilage defects in patients with early osteoarthritis is characterized by fibrocartilaginous repair. The balance of cell number to extracellular matrix is shifted towards an increased cell number in this tissue. Articular cartilage repair did not reach the quality of normal hyaline articular cartilage.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effect of using bone marrow stimulation techniques (such as microfracture and Pridie drilling) to repair articular cartilage defects in patients with early - stage osteoarthritis (OA). Specifically, the study aims to comprehensively analyze the characteristics of the repaired tissue through biochemical, histological and immunohistochemical methods and compare it with the surrounding normal articular cartilage. ### Research Background Bone marrow stimulation techniques (such as microfracture and Pridie drilling) are common methods for treating articular cartilage defects in patients with early - stage osteoarthritis. These techniques allow cells from the bone marrow to enter the defect area and form repaired tissue by disrupting the subchondral bone plate. However, there is still a lack of in - depth research on the long - term effects of these techniques in patients with early - stage osteoarthritis, especially the specific nature of the repaired tissue. ### Research Objectives 1. **Evaluate the characteristics of the repaired tissue**: Comprehensively evaluate the repaired tissue formed by bone marrow stimulation techniques through biochemical, histological and immunohistochemical analysis. 2. **Compare the repaired tissue with the surrounding cartilage**: Compare the characteristics of the repaired tissue with the surrounding native articular cartilage to understand the repair effect. 3. **Determine the reasons for repair failure**: Explore why bone marrow stimulation techniques fail to effectively repair cartilage defects, resulting in patients ultimately needing total joint replacement surgery. ### Main Findings - **Nature of the repaired tissue**: The repaired tissue is mainly fibrocartilage, with a relatively high cell density but a low content of extracellular matrix (such as proteoglycans). - **Collagen types**: The repaired tissue is positive for type II collagen and sometimes also positive for type I collagen, while type X collagen is expressed in both the repaired tissue and the surrounding cartilage. - **Cell - matrix balance**: The number of cells in the repaired tissue increases relative to the extracellular matrix, indicating active cell proliferation but insufficient matrix synthesis. - **Comparison with the surrounding cartilage**: Although the repaired tissue is superior to the surrounding degenerated cartilage in some aspects, it still does not reach the quality of normal hyaline cartilage. ### Conclusion The repaired tissue formed by bone marrow stimulation techniques in patients with early - stage osteoarthritis is mainly fibrocartilage, with a relatively high cell density but a low matrix content and does not reach the quality of normal hyaline cartilage. These findings provide an important basis for future improvement of cartilage repair methods based on bone marrow stimulation. ### Formula Summary The main data and results involved in the article are presented in tabular form and do not involve complex mathematical formulas. Here are several key scoring systems: - **Sellers Score**: - Range: 0 (normal articular cartilage and complete regeneration) to 31 (empty defect, no repaired tissue) - **ICRS Visual Histological Assessment Scale**: - A high score indicates complete regeneration. - **Mankin Score**: - Used to assess the degree of degeneration of the surrounding cartilage, with a range of 5 - 11, corresponding to early - to - severe osteoarthritis The application of these scoring systems helps researchers comprehensively evaluate the quality and characteristics of the repaired tissue.