Labour segmentation in NCR Delhi's automobile sector: a political response of capital to labour struggles
Shreya Ghosh,Ritajyoti Bandyopadhyay,Shreya GhoshRitajyoti Bandyopadhyaya Independent Researcher,New Delhi,Indiab Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali,Manauli,IndiaShreya Ghosh completed her MPhil in Political Science at Jawaharlal Nehru University. She is presently an independent researcher and social activist based in New Delhi. Her research interests involve questions of informatisation,labour and collectivisation.Ritajyoti Bandyopadhyay's earlier and on-going research projects explore themes in informality,infrastructure technologies,urban history,and governmentality studies in late-colonial and postcolonial India. He also works on the trajectories of capitalist accumulation and urbanisation in twentieth-century metropolitan India,postcolonial statecraft and its relationship with knowledge,social policy,rent and tenancy relations in South Asian cities,and mass political formation under popular sovereignty and neoliberalism. He is the author of Streets in Motion: The Making of Infrastructure,Property,and Political Culture in Twentieth-century Calcutta,Cambridge,2022. Bandyopadhyay works in the interface of academics and activism,using one context to ask questions about the other.Â
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2024.2327457
2024-03-23
Third World Quarterly
Abstract:This paper aims to understand the changing dynamics of internal labour market segmentation intertwined with the history of working-class struggle in an industrial belt in India's National Capital Region (NCR). Nuances of workers' class struggle in the automobile sector in Delhi-NCR over the last 15 years have shown that unity between permanent and contract workers was key to several successful struggles against worsening work conditions and management control within the global value chains of automobile production. Our fieldwork findings, along with direct and indirect political engagement in the region, reveal that increasing salaries and allotment of supervisory roles to small sections of permanent workers, coupled with the simultaneous fragmentation a lower strata of workers into multiple categories with very low salaries, benefits and heavy workloads, have been significant attempts by capital to break class solidarity among different sections of workers. Relatively pro-labour legislation and trade unions tend to concentrate in high-wage zones, while low-wage and precarious employment remains unprotected by such institutional mechanisms. Labour segmentation is inherent to capitalist exploitation, guarded by institutional mechanisms. Advanced mechanisation reduces distinction of skill requirements between highly paid permanent and lowly paid contract workers. In this context, labour segmentation is a political response to trade unionism from the side of capitalist management.
development studies