Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of sustainability disclosures and disclosure ratings on firm value. This paper compares the informativeness of sustainability disclosures in company reports versus environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure ratings. The authors examine the extent to which they provide incremental information. Design/methodology/approach The sample consists of panel data from over 2,600 publicly-listed non-financial US companies for the period 2014–2018. The authors obtain sustainability disclosures from Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Navigator and ESG disclosure scores from Bloomberg. The authors regress market value and/or stock price on sustainability disclosures and ESG scores to evaluate information content. Findings ESG scores are positively associated with market value and price. Sustainability disclosures in the form of metrics and company-tailored narratives provide incremental information content on market value and/or price. Boilerplate disclosures reduce market value and price. Sustainability disclosures and ESG scores provide incremental information, suggesting that it would be beneficial to harmonize standards for reporting sustainability disclosures. Research limitations/implications The limitation is that the authors have only considered sustainability disclosures for a sample of US companies from two sources – SASB Navigator and Bloomberg. Practical implications The paper provides some evidence that may be pertinent to the debate on whether to harmonize the guidance on reporting sustainability issues. Social implications The paper provides evidence on the benefits to firms for reporting sustainability issues. Originality/value This paper is among the first to analyze company sustainability disclosures obtained from two different sources – SASB Navigator and ESG disclosure ratings – and compare them for relevance for company valuation. With SASB Navigator, the authors obtain further refinement into the nature of the information provided in the sustainability disclosures, that is, boilerplate, company-tailored or metrics disclosures.

Sustainability Disclosures and Cost of Capital

Transparency Pays: How Carbon Emission Disclosure Lowers Cost of Capital

Disclosure and Cost of Equity Capital Revisited

The Effect of Sustainability Information Disclosure on the Cost of Equity Capital: An Empirical Analysis Based on Gartner Top 50 Supply Chain Rankings

Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency

ESG Disclosure and the Cost of Capital: Is There a Ratcheting Effect over Time?

Environmental transparency and investors' risk perception: Cross‐country evidence on multinational corporations' sustainability practices and cost of equity

Corporate Carbon Information Disclosure and Financing Costs: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable Development

The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Disclosure on Cost of Debt: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Reputation

Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

The Effect of Disclosures by Management, Analysts, and Business Press on Cost of Capital, Return Volatility, and Analyst Forecasts: A Study Using Content Analysis

Between cost and value

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Intellectual Capital Disclosure, Risk Disclosure, Cost of Capital: Moderating Role of Earnings Management

Cost of debt financing, stock returns, and corporate strategic ESG disclosure: Evidence from China

Corporate governance and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and its effect on the cost of capital in emerging market

Comparing the informativeness of sustainability disclosures versus ESG disclosure ratings

Corporate sustainability performance and informativeness of earnings

Corporate social responsibility and debt financing cost: evidence from China

Regulation intensity, environmental disclosure, and cost of capital: evidence from listed firms in China

Does the Provision of Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Influence the Cost of Equity Capital? Evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom