Abstract:Purpose Although the association between sustainability assurance (SA) quality and firm value has been examined in previous studies, the moderating relationship is novel in this study and highlights the effect of corporate environmental sustainability performance (CESP) on the relationship between SA quality and firm value. This study aims to examine whether such an effect is strengthened or weakened by eco-efficiency, as measured by ISO 14001 certification, aggregate CESP score and each individual dimension of CESP (emission reduction [ER], resource reduction [RR] and product innovation [PI]). Design/methodology/approach The sample includes 40 companies in Euronext Paris with the largest market capitalisations (the Cotation Assistée en Continu 40 [CAC 40] index) from 2010 to 2020. The authors apply the feasible generalised least squares regression technique to estimate all the regression models. Because observed associations may be biased by reverse causation or self-selection, the authors use the instrumental variable approach and Heckman two-stage estimation. Findings The results show that SA quality had a positive and significant effect on firm value. Second, the authors demonstrate that CESP, as assessed by ISO 14001 certification, has a stronger interaction with assurance quality and acting as a moderator variable. Using the ASSET4 scores, an alternative proxy for CESP, the authors find inconsistent evidence regarding the impact of CESP attributes. The CESP and ER scores are homogeneous and have a positive effect on firm value. However, the PI and RR CESP attributes are not homogenous and do not have the same interactive effect on firm value. The results are robust to the use of an instrumental variable approach and the Heckman two-stage estimation procedure. Research limitations/implications Policy implications: Regulators may be interested in the findings when considering current and future assurance requirements for sustainability reporting, and shareholders when considering SA as an investment choice criterion. The insights into and enhanced understanding of the incentives for obtaining high SA quality can help policymakers develop effective policies and initiatives for SA. Considering the possible improvements in sustainability performance when obtaining a high level of sustainability verification, governments need to consider mandating SA. Practical implications Firms receive clear confirmation of the importance of investing in SA quality. Financial markets do not evaluate SA dichotomously but reward companies with higher SA quality because of the greater credibility it provides. Firms should allocate a significant percentage of their annual budgets and other relevant resources to environmental training and development programmes to improve and maintain environmental performance. If they care about environmental issues, they must announce this by issuing sustainability reports and seeking assurance of the information disclosed. High-quality assurance not only has a significant effect on investors’ investment reliability judgements but also the perceived credibility of environmental performance fully moderates the effect of assurance on these judgements. Social implications This study has social implications; the authors find that the French market rewards firms that provide a high-quality assurance to guarantee the integrity of their sustainability reports. Therefore, by incorporating environmental sustainability into their financial goals, a better assurance ultimately will urge firms to move from green washing to strategic goals, which is beneficial for society. Further, firms that focus on sustainability as part of their business strategy may attract employees who engage in green behaviours at work and create a friendlier and productive environment because it gives meaning to the work they do and keeps them engaged to the level needed to perform their jobs capably. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by re-examining the relationship between SA quality and firm value. It also provides new evidence on the moderating effect of CESP on the SA quality–firm value nexus. Specifically, it explores the joint effect of credibility and eco-efficiency on market confidence in sustainability information.

Between cost and value

Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector

Sustainability reporting in food industry: an innovative tool for enhancing financial performance

Sustainability reporting and performance of MENA banks: is there a trade-off?

Sustainability reporting and bank performance after financial crisis

Do Sustainability Activities Affect the Financial Performance of Banks? The Case of Indonesian Banks

ESG disclosure practices and financial performance: a general and sector analysis of SP-500 non-financial companies and the moderating effect of economic conditions

Comparing the informativeness of sustainability disclosures versus ESG disclosure ratings

Sustainability Disclosures and Cost of Capital

Beyond Compliance: How ESG Reporting and Strong Governance Influence the Cost of Capital in UK Firms

Beyond compliance: evaluating the role of environmental, social and governance disclosures in enhancing firm value and performance

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance

Corporate sustainability performance and informativeness of earnings

Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure and Value Generation: Is the Financial Industry Different?

The trilogy in sustainability of environmental performance, assurance quality and firm value

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) PRACTICE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE

Sustainable Investment Practices: Assessing the Influence of ESG Factors on Financial Performance

Bridging the gap: How sustainable development can help companies create shareholder value and improve financial performance

How Sustainability Contributes to Shared Value Creation and Firms’ Value

The interplay of sustainability, corporate green accounting and firm financial performance: a meta-analytical investigation