Abstract:Background: Long-term outcomes in patients undergoing emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) remain controversial. This study aims to assess short- and long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective CRC surgery. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing emergency or elective colonic resections for CRC from January 2013 to December 2017 were included. Primary outcome was long-term survival. As secondary outcomes, we sought to analyze potential differences on postoperative morbidity and concerning the oncological standard of surgical resection. The Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare survival between the groups. Results: Overall, 225 CRC patients were included. Of these 192 (85.3%) had an elective and 33 (14.7%) an emergency operation. Emergency indications were due to obstruction, perforation, or bleeding. Patients in the emergency group had higher ASA score (p = 0.023), higher Charlsson comorbidity index (CCI, p = 0.012), and were older than those in the elective group, with median age 70 (IQR 63-79) years and 78 (IQR 68-83) years, for elective and emergency, respectively (p = 0.020). No other preoperative differences were observed. Patients in the emergency group experienced significantly more major complications (12.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.037), more anastomotic leakage (12.1% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001), need for reoperation (12.1% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.021), and postoperative mortality (2 patients vs. 0, p < 0.001). No differences in terms of final pathological stage, nor in accuracy of lymphadenectomy were observed. Overall survival was significantly worse in case of emergency operation, with estimated median 41 months vs. not reached in elective cases (p < 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, emergency operation was confirmed as independent unfavorable determinant of survival (with hazard rate HR = 1.97, p = 0.028), together with age (HR = 1.05, p < 0.001), postoperative major morbidity (HR = 3.18, p = 0.012), advanced stage (HR = 5.85, p < 0.001), and need for transfusion (HR = 2.10, p = 0.049). Conclusion: Postoperative morbidity and mortality were increased in emergency versus elective CRC resections. Despite no significant differences in terms of accuracy of resection and pathological stages, overall survival was significantly worse in patients who underwent emergency procedure, and independent of other determinants of survival.

Prior endoscopic resection does not affect the outcome of secondary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer, a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic Resection Before Surgery Does Not Affect the Recurrence Rate in Patients With High-Risk T1 Colorectal Cancer

The Effect of Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection on Ct1n0m0 Colorectal Carcinoma Patients Who Underwent Additional Surgery

Long-term outcomes of additional surgery after endoscopic resection versus primary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma

Effects of prior endoscopic resection on recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery

Surgical resection after endoscopic resection in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Long-Term Outcomes of T1 Colorectal Cancer after Endoscopic Resection

Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection: the different endoscopic techniques for colorectal tumors

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic or surgical resection in T1 colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

Emergency Resection for Colonic Cancer Has an Independent and Unfavorable Effect on Long-Term Oncologic Outcome

Safety and efficiency of endoscopic resection versus laparoscopic resection in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection after Endoscopic Resection in Pt1b Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study in China

Clinical outcomes of primary esophagectomy and secondary esophagectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity-score matched analysis.

Can transanal endoscopic microsurgery effectively treat T1 or T2 rectal cancer?A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comparing surgical and endoscopic resection approaches for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors within the diameter range of 10-20mm: an inverse probability weighting analysis based on the SEER database

Can an Incomplete ERAS Protocol Reduce Postoperative Complications Compared with Conventional Care in Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer? A Multicenter Observational Cohort and Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Effect of implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and risk factors on 3-year survival after colorectal surgery for cancer–a retrospective cohort of 1001 patients

Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection in colorectal adenoma and tumors: Meta-analysis and system review

Effect of perioperative chemotherapy on resection of isolated pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: A single center experience

Effect of chemoradiation on the development of second primary cancers after endoscopic resection of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma