Abstract:Background: Domestic and international guidelines recommend endoscopic resection for stage T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma with indications. However, completion surgery remains imperative for patients exhibiting high-risk factors subsequent to endoscopic procedures. Objective: To investigate the evidence, pathological features, and surgical outcomes of completion surgery in patients with T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma following endoscopic resection. Methods: We retrospectively collect data on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with stage T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent endoscopic resection followed by surgical resection and those who initially completed surgical intervention at Peking University International Hospital between January 2019 and October 2022, with the aim of assessing the necessity and feasibility of surgical intervention. Results: Seventeen patients (Group A) with high-risk factors following endoscopic procedure, especially with deep submucosal invasion and vascular or lymphatic invasion, experienced further surgical resection. The median interval between endoscopic resection and completion surgery was 23.71 days ± 15.89. Sixteen patients (Group B) underwent radical resection without any prior interventions. The surgical approach involves integration of laparoscopy and colonoscopy for precise localization and quantitative diagnosis, followed by radical surgery. The two groups demonstrated significant differences statistically with reference to tumor diameter (1.65 cm ± 0.77 vs 3.36 cm ± 1.39, P = 0.000) and the attainment of standard lymph node count (cases of detected lymph nodes larger than or equal to 12, 5 vs 12, P = 0.015). Postoperative complications and hospital stay manifested no significant disparity statistically in two groups. Patients who underwent completion surgery had no inferior outcomes compared with those who underwent direct surgery in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (Log rank test: P = 0.083, Breslow test: P = 0.089). The two groups also exhibited no significant differences statistically in the context of overall survival (Log rank test: P = 0.652, Breslow test: P = 0.758). Conclusion: Completion surgery is a safe and feasible treatment option for T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma patients with high-risk factors, particularly those with deep submucosal invasion and vascular or lymphatic invasion following endoscopic treatment. Furthermore, subsequent treatment should be chosen based on a comprehensive analysis of the patient's history of abdominal surgery, willingness, and pathological features.

Surgical resection after endoscopic resection in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Comparison of endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Endoscopic Mucosal Resectionvsendoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumours: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prior endoscopic resection does not affect the outcome of secondary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer, a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Improves Overall Survival for T3/4N+M0 Rectal Cancer Patients: a Population-Based Study of 20300 Patients

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma

The Effect of Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection on Ct1n0m0 Colorectal Carcinoma Patients Who Underwent Additional Surgery

Long-term outcomes of additional surgery after endoscopic resection versus primary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer

Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection: the different endoscopic techniques for colorectal tumors

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic or surgical resection in T1 colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

Endoscopic Resection Before Surgery Does Not Affect the Recurrence Rate in Patients With High-Risk T1 Colorectal Cancer

Long-Term Outcomes of T1 Colorectal Cancer after Endoscopic Resection

Effects of prior endoscopic resection on recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery

Outcomes of surgery for gastric cancer with distant metastases: a retrospective study from the SEER database.

The Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection after Endoscopic Resection in Pt1b Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study in China

Can transanal endoscopic microsurgery effectively treat T1 or T2 rectal cancer?A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Comparing surgical and endoscopic resection approaches for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors within the diameter range of 10-20mm: an inverse probability weighting analysis based on the SEER database

Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection in colorectal adenoma and tumors: Meta-analysis and system review

Meta-analysis of efficacy of primary tumor resection for asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases

Endoscopic Resection of Stage T1 Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Followed by Surgical Intervention: a Single-center Retrospective Study

Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis