Comment about lack of sufficient data on “A prediction model for finding the optimal laser parameters in additive manufacturing of NiTi shape memory alloy” by Mehrpouya et al. [The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105.11 (2019): 4691–4699.]

Omar Ahmed Mohamed,Wei Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00236-9
2021-11-03
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Abstract:With artificial neutral network (ANN), a recent work published in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, has discussed the compressive behaviour and transformation temperature of shape-memory nickel-titanium (NiTi,) alloy manufactured by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). However, the amount of data reported is not sufficient to determine the number of fitting parameters in the network. Therefore, the model is not proven convincing statistically. This implies that the ANN model developed in the published work should be used with caution. Here we have re-evaluated the data reported in the aforementioned study through a comprehensive analysis using multiple regression modelling. It was found that the total achievable strain of LPBF NiTi in its as-built state was largely affected by laser power and scanning speed, while recovery ratio was significantly influenced by hatch spacing, followed by laser power.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?