Abstract:Background: Poor self-control is a strong correlate of criminal propensity. It is conceptualized and operationalized differently in criminology than in other scientific traditions. Aims: (1) To verify the dimensionality of the criminological Grasmick self-control items, other self-regulation items and morality ones. (2) To re-interpret the dimensions using a clinical perspective, a taxonomic/diagnostic model and references to possible "biological underpinnings." (3) Validate the dimensions by associations with crime. Method: Population: all persons born 1995 in Malmö and living there at age 12. A random sample (N = 525) filled in a comprehensive self-report questionnaire on themes like personality, crime/abuse and social aspects at age 15, 16 and 18. Age 18 data were analysed: 191 men and 220 women. Results: Self-regulation items were 4-dimensional: ADHD problems (Behavior control and Executive skills) and two Aggression factors. Morality items formed a fifth dimension. Negative Affect and Social interaction factors covered the rest of the variance. The validity of these factors was backed up by correlations with similar items/factors. Self-regulation subscales predicted crimes better than the Grasmick scale; an interaction with morality improved prediction still further. Sex differences were over-all small with three exceptions: Aggression, Morality and Negative affect. Conclusion: We identified four dimensions of the 20-item Grasmick instrument: Cognitive action control (impulsiveness/sensation seeking, response inhibition), Executive skills/future orientation, Affective/aggression reactivity and Aggression control. All should be possible to link to brain functional modules. Much can be gained if we are able to formulate an integrated model of self-regulation including distinct brain functional modules, process-and trait-oriented models, relevant diagnoses and clinical experiences of individual cases.

A cross-cultural validation of self-control theory

A Test of Self‐Control Theory Across Different Socioeconomic Strata

A General Test of Self-Control Theory

An Empirical Test of Low Self-Control Theory

Parent–Child Relations and Delinquency Among African American and European American Juvenile Offenders: An Expanded Examination of Self-Control Theory

Self-control in criminology: we need a broader conceptualization and links to psychiatric diagnoses

Gender and Self‐Control Theory: Are There Differences in the Measures and the Theory's Causal Model?

Self-control and social control in childhood misconduct and aggression: The role of family structure, hyperactivity, and hostile parenting

High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.

Gender, Age, and Crime/Deviance: A Challenge to Self-Control Theory

Investigating Sex-Related Moderation Effects and Mediation Effects of Self-Control on Delinquency Among Portuguese Youth

Exploring the Utility of Self-Control Theory for Risky Behavior and Minor Delinquency Among Chinese Adolescents

A self-control/life-course theory of criminal behavior

Culture moderates the relationship between self-control ability and free will beliefs in childhood

A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety

The General Theory of Crime Revisited: Comparing the Relative Effects of Parental Responsiveness and Parental Behavioral Control on Aggressive and Nonaggressive Antisocial Behavior in Adolescence

Still waters run deep: self-control as a moderator of dark personality traits for antisocial conduct and violent attitudes

Illicit Sexual Behavior: A Test of Self-Control Theory

Assessing Two Measurements of Self-Control for Juvenile Delinquency in China

The Role of Morality and Self-Control in Conditioning the Criminogenic Effect of Provocation. A Partial Test of Situational Action Theory

Modern Control Theory and the Limits of Criminal Justice