Abstract:Background: Poor self-control is a strong correlate of criminal propensity. It is conceptualized and operationalized differently in criminology than in other scientific traditions. Aims: (1) To verify the dimensionality of the criminological Grasmick self-control items, other self-regulation items and morality ones. (2) To re-interpret the dimensions using a clinical perspective, a taxonomic/diagnostic model and references to possible "biological underpinnings." (3) Validate the dimensions by associations with crime. Method: Population: all persons born 1995 in Malmö and living there at age 12. A random sample (N = 525) filled in a comprehensive self-report questionnaire on themes like personality, crime/abuse and social aspects at age 15, 16 and 18. Age 18 data were analysed: 191 men and 220 women. Results: Self-regulation items were 4-dimensional: ADHD problems (Behavior control and Executive skills) and two Aggression factors. Morality items formed a fifth dimension. Negative Affect and Social interaction factors covered the rest of the variance. The validity of these factors was backed up by correlations with similar items/factors. Self-regulation subscales predicted crimes better than the Grasmick scale; an interaction with morality improved prediction still further. Sex differences were over-all small with three exceptions: Aggression, Morality and Negative affect. Conclusion: We identified four dimensions of the 20-item Grasmick instrument: Cognitive action control (impulsiveness/sensation seeking, response inhibition), Executive skills/future orientation, Affective/aggression reactivity and Aggression control. All should be possible to link to brain functional modules. Much can be gained if we are able to formulate an integrated model of self-regulation including distinct brain functional modules, process-and trait-oriented models, relevant diagnoses and clinical experiences of individual cases.

Self-control in criminology: we need a broader conceptualization and links to psychiatric diagnoses

The ‘Drug–Crime Link’ from a Self-Control Perspective

A General Test of Self-Control Theory

When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation

A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety

High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.

Still waters run deep: self-control as a moderator of dark personality traits for antisocial conduct and violent attitudes

I just cannot control myself: The Dark Triad and self-control

Gender, Age, and Crime/Deviance: A Challenge to Self-Control Theory

Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime

Assessing Two Measurements of Self-Control for Juvenile Delinquency in China

Dark Triad Psychopathy Outperforms Self-Control in Predicting Antisocial Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Modern Control Theory and the Limits of Criminal Justice

Investigating Sex-Related Moderation Effects and Mediation Effects of Self-Control on Delinquency Among Portuguese Youth

Rethinking the Measurement of Self-Control: Distinguishing Among Self-Control Capacity, Urge Intensity, and Behavior Outcomes

It's all in the Record: Assessing Self-Control Theory with an Offender Sample

Cool and hot executive function problems in young children: linking self-regulation processes to emerging clinical symptoms

The relationship between four indicators of future time orientation, criminal thinking style, and illegal behaviors

Parent–Child Relations and Delinquency Among African American and European American Juvenile Offenders: An Expanded Examination of Self-Control Theory

Self-control and social control in childhood misconduct and aggression: The role of family structure, hyperactivity, and hostile parenting