David Geller,R. Swijnenburg,Tom K. Gallagher,E. Sparrelid,R. Memeo,S. Lopez Ben,Pablo E Serrano,J. Martinie,D. Fuks,B. Goh,A. Benedetti Cacciaguerra,Y. Koh,U. Cillo,V. Morrison-Jones,D. Aghayan,F. Cipriani,B. Edwin,G. Zimmitti,A. Ruzzenente,Daniel Osei Bordom,Shafiq Rehman,Rong Liu,S. Conci,Kongyuan Wei,F. Ratti,D. Vrochides,E. Jovine,G. Zozaya,Roland S Croner,Robert P. Sutcliffe,S. Tzedakis,A. Alseidi,J. Primrose,Å. Fretland,K. Crespo,Fabrizio Di Benedetto,M. Efanov,C. Caula,M. Schmelzle,L. Aldrighetti,S. White,M. Besselink,T. Hoogteijling,R. Robles Campos,F. Giuliante,F. Rotellar,Jacopo Lanari,P. Magistri,M. D'Hondt,I. Dagher,I. Sucandy,Louis Haentjens,Jawad Ahmad,Jasper P. Sijberden,M. Abu Hilal,N. Russolillo,B. Görgec,D. D’Souza,M. Vivarelli,E. Tan,A. Ferrero

Abstract:Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic liver surgery (RLS) and laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) in various settings. Background: Clear advantages of RLS over LLS have rarely been demonstrated, and the associated costs of robotic surgery are generally higher than those of laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, the exact role of the robotic approach in minimally invasive liver surgery remains to be defined. Methods: In this international retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of patients who underwent RLS and LLS for all indications between 2009 and 2021 in 34 hepatobiliary referral centers were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare both approaches across several types of procedures: (1) minor resections in the anterolateral (2, 3, 4b, 5, and 6) or (2) posterosuperior segments (1, 4a, 7, 8), and (3) major resections (≥3 contiguous segments). Propensity score matching was used to mitigate the influence of selection bias. The primary outcome was textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS), previously defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents ≥grade 2, postoperative bile leak ≥grade B, severe morbidity, readmission, and 90-day or in-hospital mortality with the presence of an R0 resection margin in case of malignancy. The absence of a prolonged length of stay was added to define TOLS+. Results: Among the 10.075 included patients, 1.507 underwent RLS and 8.568 LLS. After propensity score matching, both groups constituted 1.505 patients. RLS was associated with higher rates of TOLS (78.3% vs 71.8%, P < 0.001) and TOLS+ (55% vs 50.4%, P = 0.026), less Pringle usage (39.1% vs 47.1%, P < 0.001), blood loss (100 vs 200 milliliters, P < 0.001), transfusions (4.9% vs 7.9%, P = 0.003), conversions (2.7% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001), overall morbidity (19.3% vs 25.7%, P < 0.001), and microscopically irradical resection margins (10.1% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.015), and shorter operative times (190 vs 210 minutes, P = 0.015). In the subgroups, RLS tended to have higher TOLS rates, compared with LLS, for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments (n = 431 per group, 75.9% vs 71.2%, P = 0.184) and major resections (n = 321 per group, 72.9% vs 67.5%, P = 0.086), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: While both produce excellent outcomes, RLS might facilitate slightly higher TOLS rates than LLS.

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic liver resection in ordinary cases of left lateral sectionectomy

Minimally Invasive Liver Resection: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy

Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Posterosuperior Region: a Retrospective Study of Consecutive Cases

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings

Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients

Level 2a evidence comparing robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a meta-analysis

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic liver resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Robotic and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: a Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis

Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis

A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms

Evaluation of the economic impact of the robotic approach in major and postero-superior segment liver resections: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience of 629 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Liver Resections

Comparison between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minor hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Propensity Score-matched Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minor Liver Resections of the Anterolateral Segments: an International Multi-center Study of 10,517 Cases