David Geller,R. Swijnenburg,Tom K. Gallagher,E. Sparrelid,R. Memeo,S. Lopez Ben,Pablo E Serrano,J. Martinie,D. Fuks,B. Goh,A. Benedetti Cacciaguerra,Y. Koh,U. Cillo,V. Morrison-Jones,D. Aghayan,F. Cipriani,B. Edwin,G. Zimmitti,A. Ruzzenente,Daniel Osei Bordom,Shafiq Rehman,Rong Liu,S. Conci,Kongyuan Wei,F. Ratti,D. Vrochides,E. Jovine,G. Zozaya,Roland S Croner,Robert P. Sutcliffe,S. Tzedakis,A. Alseidi,J. Primrose,Å. Fretland,K. Crespo,Fabrizio Di Benedetto,M. Efanov,C. Caula,M. Schmelzle,L. Aldrighetti,S. White,M. Besselink,T. Hoogteijling,R. Robles Campos,F. Giuliante,F. Rotellar,Jacopo Lanari,P. Magistri,M. D'Hondt,I. Dagher,I. Sucandy,Louis Haentjens,Jawad Ahmad,Jasper P. Sijberden,M. Abu Hilal,N. Russolillo,B. Görgec,D. D’Souza,M. Vivarelli,E. Tan,A. Ferrero

Abstract:Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic liver surgery (RLS) and laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) in various settings. Background: Clear advantages of RLS over LLS have rarely been demonstrated, and the associated costs of robotic surgery are generally higher than those of laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, the exact role of the robotic approach in minimally invasive liver surgery remains to be defined. Methods: In this international retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of patients who underwent RLS and LLS for all indications between 2009 and 2021 in 34 hepatobiliary referral centers were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare both approaches across several types of procedures: (1) minor resections in the anterolateral (2, 3, 4b, 5, and 6) or (2) posterosuperior segments (1, 4a, 7, 8), and (3) major resections (≥3 contiguous segments). Propensity score matching was used to mitigate the influence of selection bias. The primary outcome was textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS), previously defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents ≥grade 2, postoperative bile leak ≥grade B, severe morbidity, readmission, and 90-day or in-hospital mortality with the presence of an R0 resection margin in case of malignancy. The absence of a prolonged length of stay was added to define TOLS+. Results: Among the 10.075 included patients, 1.507 underwent RLS and 8.568 LLS. After propensity score matching, both groups constituted 1.505 patients. RLS was associated with higher rates of TOLS (78.3% vs 71.8%, P < 0.001) and TOLS+ (55% vs 50.4%, P = 0.026), less Pringle usage (39.1% vs 47.1%, P < 0.001), blood loss (100 vs 200 milliliters, P < 0.001), transfusions (4.9% vs 7.9%, P = 0.003), conversions (2.7% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001), overall morbidity (19.3% vs 25.7%, P < 0.001), and microscopically irradical resection margins (10.1% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.015), and shorter operative times (190 vs 210 minutes, P = 0.015). In the subgroups, RLS tended to have higher TOLS rates, compared with LLS, for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments (n = 431 per group, 75.9% vs 71.2%, P = 0.184) and major resections (n = 321 per group, 72.9% vs 67.5%, P = 0.086), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: While both produce excellent outcomes, RLS might facilitate slightly higher TOLS rates than LLS.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Posterosuperior Region: a Retrospective Study of Consecutive Cases

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Posterosuperior Segments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Outcomes Compared with Conventional Open Surgery.

Robotic vs laparoscopic hemihepatectomy: A comparative study from a single center.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings

Comparison between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic liver resection in ordinary cases of left lateral sectionectomy

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience of 629 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Liver Resections

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection: a Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matched Studies.

Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection—comparative experiences at a high-volume German academic center

Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for difficult posterosuperior segments: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies

Short- and Long-term Outcomes after Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignancies: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Propensity Score-matched Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minor Liver Resections of the Anterolateral Segments: an International Multi-center Study of 10,517 Cases

Minimally Invasive Liver Resection: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy

Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for lesions located in anterolateral and posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis

Minimally Invasive Liver Resection: from Laparoscopic to Robotic

Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver